Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I've read that red wine is good for you, that it's bad for you and that you need to drink less so I've decided to give that up and hit the really hard stuff, instead.
You can tell all that just by reading any news story that claims to be reporting the findings of a scientific study, and then looking at the actual study.
Quiet news day. No horror stories to report so they dig up something almost horrific.
Last night was a slow one for BBC London - their main bulletin included a piece about a lady who had bought an old suitcase that belonged to a vicar, who wanted to know more about the vicar's involvement in D-day.
I've read that red wine is good for you, that it's bad for you and that you need to drink less so I've decided to give up.
It would be interesting to know what the basis for this new advice is, given that the previous advice had no scientific grounding whatsoever - it was literally just a load of conjectures made by one person many years ago, and presented as medical advice.
You can tell all that just by reading any news story that claims to be reporting the findings of a scientific study, and then looking at the actual study.
"…the long-held belief…" should be read as "…the grotesque misinterpretation of scientific studies by arts graduates who may understand Beowulf in the original language but don't even know the difference between a hypothesis and a theory, and only went into journalism because they didn't fancy teaching…".
"…the long-held belief…" should be read as "…the grotesque misinterpretation of scientific studies by arts graduates who may understand Beowulf in the original language but don't even know the difference between a hypothesis and a theory, and only went into journalism because they didn't fancy teaching…".
I have a simpler system. Divide all the food and drinks into two types. The ones you like and the ones you don't. Avoid the ones you don't like and enjoy the ones you do.
Bingo, your stress levels drop and you live a longer and happier life.
Leave a comment: