• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Anti-virus: Seriously serious thread"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Just the windows built in thingy, plus Trusteer and BT protect. Occasionally run Malwarebytes. Think being ancient with diminished interest in porn is main protection.

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    More forgetful ladies.
    Possible to share some pics / screenshots? IT experts like Vetran, Markymark, BP can scrutinize them and help you with resolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    More forgetful ladies.

    Redirect from spaces.slimspot again
    Added to hosts

    127.0.0.1 spaces.slimspots.com
    127.0.0.1 www .spaces.slimspots.com

    We'll see...

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    More forgetful ladies.

    Redirect from spaces.slimspot again

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    When it comes to dealing with serious viruses, the question should be:
    WWAWMD?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    I haven't had a virus since the days of passing these or getting them off of top shelf magazines:

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Who installed it you, or some bod in IBM?

    All the linux distros I've used have been faster than booting windows especially as they allow me to use cheap crappy hardware. (I'm currently writing this on an Ubuntu laptop)
    All automatic, via IBM's Lifeboat bootable installer - google it - the IBM Open Client is no secret, basically RH. Lappy was a Thinkpad T410.

    TBF it's laudable what they are trying to do, just it's too slow and half the things don't work, i.e. need a Windows VM for vSphere, need Windows VM for Notes cos it's quicker, etc. It's mental because they are saying Windows is insecure etc, but let you run Windows in KVM.....

    At current clientco it's BYOD and I have all I want on my MacBook Pro with zero issues apart from lack of space on the 512mb SSD.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    No it it was pukka Red Hat with mods and registered with a proper RHN subscription. We had Windows 7 originally and had to 'update' to OC.

    It deffo slowed lappy down, and we were all Unix heads! Number one was disk access was lamentably slow, cured by SSD but not for contractors, permies only. The worst was RDP access and multiscreens, res wrong, appearing on wrong screen, and another was Notes, awful.

    We all hated it. I'm not anti 'it', had OpenSolaris on my lappy in my Sun days that was fine apart from StarOffice but on the whole I think there's too many distros, libraries, I mean WTF is Cairo, Pango and cracklib?
    Who installed it you, or some bod in IBM?

    All the linux distros I've used have been faster than booting windows especially as they allow me to use cheap crappy hardware. (I'm currently writing this on an Ubuntu laptop)

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    No it it was pukka Red Hat with mods and registered with a proper RHN subscription. We had Windows 7 originally and had to 'update' to OC.

    It deffo slowed lappy down, and we were all Unix heads! Number one was disk access was lamentably slow, cured by SSD but not for contractors, permies only. The worst was RDP access and multiscreens, res wrong, appearing on wrong screen, and another was Notes, awful.

    We all hated it. I'm not anti 'it', had OpenSolaris on my lappy in my Sun days that was fine apart from StarOffice but on the whole I think there's too many distros, libraries, I mean WTF is Cairo, Pango and cracklib?
    Well, as said, Im not using it commercially but Linux mint doesnt slow my lappie down, it actaully boots quicker than a new lappie running windoz 8 (never upgraded it to 10 because I put Linux on it within 4 weeks of buying it) its cleaner too.

    I dont have any influence over clients but I wont be going back to windoz for a non commercial perspective.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Anti-virus: Seriously serious thread

    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    Well, I guess you are a rich man now thanks to all those millions you received from African businessmen.
    Last edited by SimonMac; 21 December 2015, 15:31.

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    I have oSX and I still have Avast Anti Virus, mainly because my NAS kept picking up (Wintel) viruses out of my junk mail folder when Time Machine backed up my Mac
    Well, I guess you are a rich man now thanks to all those millions you received from African businessmen.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    I have oSX and I still have Avast Anti Virus, mainly because my NAS kept picking up (Wintel) viruses out of my junk mail folder when Time Machine backed up my Mac

    Leave a comment:


  • rl4engc
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Is it even possible to get a virus without explicitly downloading and installing something these days? It shouldn't be.
    Yep a couple of years ago I was on some dodgy download site, all of a sudden a load of popups appeared in quick succession, CPU fans started going hell for leather, any address I typed into browser got changed to some tulip site.

    Did a scan which seemed to clean some bits up, but then I noticed when I went to my internet banking, there was an extra text box under the usual "select digits 1, 6, 9 from your memorable information" asking for the full phrase!! I think it was a rootkit, think I had to rebuild it in the end as nothing would shift it.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
    LOL! You mean a client was using Linux Mint v 17 for commercial purposes! Im not surprised they \ you had issues.

    However, for non commercial use Id say its far superior to windoz. Sure, some of it is different to what you may be used to but to claim its a POS is, well, a POS in itself.
    No it it was pukka Red Hat with mods and registered with a proper RHN subscription. We had Windows 7 originally and had to 'update' to OC.

    It deffo slowed lappy down, and we were all Unix heads! Number one was disk access was lamentably slow, cured by SSD but not for contractors, permies only. The worst was RDP access and multiscreens, res wrong, appearing on wrong screen, and another was Notes, awful.

    We all hated it. I'm not anti 'it', had OpenSolaris on my lappy in my Sun days that was fine apart from StarOffice but on the whole I think there's too many distros, libraries, I mean WTF is Cairo, Pango and cracklib?

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    When I was at IBM we had to have their Open Client Red Hat install on our laptops, what a total POS that was, ask Scruff, he was almost driven to suicide because of it!

    I actually preferred Windows, and that's saying something.
    LOL! You mean a client was using Linux Mint v 17 for commercial purposes! Im not surprised they \ you had issues.

    However, for non commercial use Id say its far superior to windoz. Sure, some of it is different to what you may be used to but to claim its a POS is, well, a POS in itself.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X