- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Welsh town declares itself offshore for tax purposes"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by _V_ View Post
Astonishing troughing going on in the public sector. There's no money for front line services. I wonder why.....
Leave a comment:
-
Do they ignore it? They seem quite strident about the efficacy of spending them on trident for example. Hey, I made a rhyme!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThe bigger question that the sanctimonious lefties like to ignore is how effective the spending of our taxes is. Because they are largely squandered any morality about the paying of it has long gone
Astonishing troughing going on in the public sector. There's no money for front line services. I wonder why.....
Leave a comment:
-
The bigger question that the sanctimonious lefties like to ignore is how effective the spending of our taxes is. Because they are largely squandered any morality about the paying of it has long gone
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostBetter than being a small man.
Your wife didn't complain. Mind you, after the first two inches, she felt brand new.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post+1 This for me.
As I said only "little people" pay taxes.
We might like to think we are "big people" but we are not
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostNot quite, they bleat about big corps not being subject to the same vilification and bullying as individuals.
As I said only "little people" pay taxes.
We might like to think we are "big people" but we are not
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostJust like there was no suggestion that many tax avoidance schemes were illegal. Didn't stop Dave and Co. bleating about "the spirit of the law", "fairness" and schemes being "morally wrong".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostJust like there was no suggestion that many tax avoidance schemes were illegal. Didn't stop Dave and Co. bleating about "the spirit of the law", "fairness" and schemes being "morally wrong".
They didn't do anything illegal, but, I'm sure they made big, out of both sales.
Only then did they declare losses, in subsequent years, as they had effectively stripped one of their main assets, out of the company.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI went back and read your Mirror link again, and it doesn't say that at all. It says they sold the property to an overseas buyer and then paid a dividend as a result from their UK company (and so must have also paid appropriate CT). Obviously they want you to jump to the conclusion that Osbourne & co. were behind the Virgin Islands company, but the article is careful not to say that, and actually says "There is no suggestion either firm did anything illegal or that Osborne & Little avoided tax."
So is it illegal/immoral to sell something to a company that happens to be in a tax haven?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI went back and read your Mirror link again, and it doesn't say that at all. It says they sold the property to an overseas buyer and then paid a dividend as a result from their UK company (and so must have also paid appropriate CT). Obviously they want you to jump to the conclusion that Osbourne & co. were behind the Virgin Islands company, but the article is careful not to say that, and actually says "There is no suggestion either firm did anything illegal or that Osborne & Little avoided tax."
So is it illegal/immoral to sell something to a company that happens to be in a tax haven?
However, I would be very surprised if the trust did not have something to do with the set up.
Obviously, the Osborne's wouldn't know anything about it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: