Originally posted by centurian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Rangers lose the big tax case
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Rangers lose the big tax case"
Collapse
-
Yep, and it was even better to fight Rangers case because they were in dire financial position and were more likely to give up early. What the revenue did not count on was the "Gerard" effect on the judicial system, but it was good odds for them - 50/50 they would hit on Celtic supportersOriginally posted by centurian View PostThey've known for years that they won't get a penny out of Rangers. That wasn't the point of the appeal.This is all about setting a legal precedent with EBTs, to try and nail the other schemes with.
Leave a comment:
-
They've known for years that they won't get a penny out of Rangers.
That wasn't the point of the appeal.
This is all about setting a legal precedent with EBTs, to try and nail the other schemes with.
Leave a comment:
-
Feck the money, if they take the titles off them I'll pass out with laughter.Originally posted by vetran View PostAs Rangers seem to have done an effective pheonix and don't get to pay. Maybe the players can?Last edited by minestrone; 4 November 2015, 14:59.
Leave a comment:
-
As Rangers seem to have done an effective pheonix and don't get to pay. Maybe the players can?Originally posted by tarbera View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Rangers lose the big tax case
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Today 07:13
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Yesterday 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55

Leave a comment: