Originally posted by nomadd
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Science Magazines
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Science Magazines"
Collapse
-
Lots of Journals here, although this is a subscription service, there is also free stuff:
Science Direct
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chef View PostThis would be the ideal thread for Doodab (RIP) to offer his wisdom being an avid science magazine geek.
RIP doodab - think of you often x
Leave a comment:
-
This would be the ideal thread for Doodab (RIP) to offer his wisdom being an avid science magazine geek.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zero Liability View PostAKA "x will give you cancer".
More excrement from the Daily Fail.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by d000hg View Post...I used to read Scientific American and New Scientist...
If you want real science, then Science and Journal home : Nature
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostAll issues up until end of 1989 are online for free: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yINSqbNUNM0C&hl=EN ...
I have a pile of dusty old New Scientists that I've been meaning to scan, knowing full well it would be an absurd waste of time and will never happen. Now I can ditch the whole lot and just download them
Leave a comment:
-
I have a subscription to New Scientist. There's usually one or two interesting articles in it. This week, for example, it has something about chemistry at super high pressures. If you have a subscription you've got access to all content online. Without a subscription, but as a registered user, there's quite a lot of content available.
All issues up until end of 1989 are online for free: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yINSqbNUNM0C&hl=EN
Definitely thinner now.
Leave a comment:
-
If I wanted to steal them, I'd just ask my ex-shoplifter friend to nick them for me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostWHS about Scientific American
IMHO the rot started setting in when Martin Gardner retired
New Scientist is still moreorless OK, although their leftie liberal stance can be rather trying. Also, the number of pages with actual content is steadily being reduced by adverts and those silly abstract art pictures that accompany every article.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhen I was in 6th form I used to read Scientific American and New Scientist as they had them in the library. I'd quite like to get back in the habit but in these modern days I wondered if I should be looking for a Kindle subscription, or if these are even the best magazines to go for.
Any recommendations? I'm interested in most areas of science really but I suppose a leaning to physics/chemistry.
Leave a comment:
-
I might have to pretend it's 1993 and pop into WH Smiths to check them out. If they still stock them.
So, no to electronic versions? I'm sure when Kindle was new they made a big fuss about having newspaper and magazine subs but it doesn't really seem to have taken off, which is a shame.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostAs stated above, the climate bollox is to the fore these days, and Scientific American is but a shadow of its former glory. ...
IMHO the rot started setting in when Martin Gardner retired
New Scientist is still moreorless OK, although their leftie liberal stance can be rather trying. Also, the number of pages with actual content is steadily being reduced by adverts and those silly abstract art pictures that accompany every article.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: