• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is any one putting their rates up 2016 - 2017"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I am due to increase my rates but not because "the nasty tax man is taking my pocket money so please can I have £50 more a day please".

    You tell your client that your costs have risen if you go this route.
    I usually show a picture of my ex-wife standing outside her massive house, with luxury executive motor car on the drive. That works. Unless the hiring manager is a woman.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I am due to increase my rates but not because "the nasty tax man is taking my pocket money so please can I have £50 more a day please".

    You tell your client that your costs have risen if you go this route.

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    Originally posted by Jack Kada View Post
    My rate has increased from £6 an hour to £6.30 an hour which is a 5% increase year on year. If I can increase my rate by 5% a year on a compounded basis I will be rich in 20 years
    Until the cost of living increases by more than 5% and then you are screwed.

    But as long as you are a director of YourCo you don't have to pay yourself NMW, so it's all good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jack Kada
    replied
    Originally posted by motoukenin View Post
    With new rules on dividends , a potential tax on expenses if sdc comes in (will do in one form or another) and a few other back door changes to the way we pay tax , is anyone going to ask for a higher rate next year ?

    Thinking of asking for 50 quid a day more next year to cover some of these extras, agent says that its possible I could get it but wont know until he asks
    My rate has increased from £6 an hour to £6.30 an hour which is a 5% increase year on year. If I can increase my rate by 5% a year on a compounded basis I will be rich in 20 years

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Doubt I'll be contracting then as I am considering a change of field.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlipTheJab
    replied
    I was on £500 quid a day as a contractor in London a while back so thats 500 * 5 * 46 = £115,000 ish. Permie devs were on 75k basic (plus bonus, pension, holidays, training etc) and contractors were deemed by all permies to be overpaid!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Nope there is still a BIK. The fact that the client or your company is paying them is irrelevant. The simple fact is that your visit to darkest Snowdonia is as essential part of your permanent job and therefore a Benefit in Kind.

    That is the insanity of it as its currently proposed... Even individual meetings are hard to justify under what is proposed..
    OK, then that is stupid. TBH, I hadn't really looked at what was happening so didn't realise the details and assumed people were being overdramatic as usual.

    So, MyCo buys a new laptop, as it's essential for me as the worker, no BIK.
    MyCo buys a train ticket, as it's needed for the business, BIK to the worker who uses it.

    I should just say I bought train tickets but never used them, so there was no benefit provided to me by MyCo buying them...

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Client has a quiet a world and asked me to have a word with my agent as I deserve a £50 a day come renewal in December

    The funny thing is I expect agent to threaten to terminate my contract, and I'll have to take it down to the wire and threaten to walk, the joys of contracting not

    I think this is more to do with length of time I've been there and business continuity on their part than any incoming legal changes (I don't think they'd give a stuff about that, they leave that all to HR)

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    Just started a gig last week at my highest rate yet - and having been giving some planning docs for the project found that the client was forced to reduce their budget for my role, otherwise it would have been stupendous.

    As for what happens next year, I'll wait and see. Divi tax is a "meh". OK, I'll end up paying a bit more tax than I used to, but I can live with that. T&S may be more of an issue, however in the past I've had contracts where I've WFH, then recharged travel costs when having to visit the office so this could be an option. As these are expenses incurred by MyCo, paid by MyCo (Corp Credit / Debit card) and then invoiced for by MyCo these are not paid to me and I'd hope this would mean no BIK.

    Where there is no WFH at all (some clients have had the opinion that everyone should be sat at a desk all day) then I'd be looking at distance / cost, whether to soak these up, increase the rate or tell the client to take a running jump.
    Nope there is still a BIK. The fact that the client or your company is paying them is irrelevant. The simple fact is that your visit to darkest Snowdonia is as essential part of your permanent job and therefore a Benefit in Kind.

    That is the insanity of it as its currently proposed... Even individual meetings are hard to justify under what is proposed..

    Leave a comment:


  • billybiro
    replied
    Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
    WFH is the golden bargaining chip now. clients won't had over extra £££ but may be more flexible with something that doesn't cost them any more. Especially if they are in the ar$e end of nowhere!
    You'd think that would be the case, wouldn't you?

    Unfortunately, this won't work out for the same reason that most companies who have "workers" (be they permies or contractors) working on a computer all day long could easily save themselves a fortune in rent, utility costs etc. by simply allowing everyone to work remotely. They could do this today and could have been doing it for many years now.

    The vast majority don't do this, of course, as there's still that fear and distrust amongst most "managers" that they need to see you physically working, a "bum-on-a-seat". This is largely due to the fact that most are so poor at actually managing that they can only manage that which they can see and thus "feel" that they have control over.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Just started a gig last week at my highest rate yet - and having been giving some planning docs for the project found that the client was forced to reduce their budget for my role, otherwise it would have been stupendous.

    As for what happens next year, I'll wait and see. Divi tax is a "meh". OK, I'll end up paying a bit more tax than I used to, but I can live with that. T&S may be more of an issue, however in the past I've had contracts where I've WFH, then recharged travel costs when having to visit the office so this could be an option. As these are expenses incurred by MyCo, paid by MyCo (Corp Credit / Debit card) and then invoiced for by MyCo these are not paid to me and I'd hope this would mean no BIK.

    Where there is no WFH at all (some clients have had the opinion that everyone should be sat at a desk all day) then I'd be looking at distance / cost, whether to soak these up, increase the rate or tell the client to take a running jump.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
    Aye Trouble is JSA is only £74 a week!
    But it is WFH.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
    Aware of that. Luckily, current client manager also sees it this way but not all do. A lot will look at what you're getting as the contractor which leads to very little sympathy if you moan about tax.
    Moaning about tax is for the pub, home and CUK only.

    Simples.

    Leave a comment:


  • psychocandy
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Permies cost twice their gross salary to the client. Cost of a permie and contractor over the longer term is not that different.

    You think your pension, holidays, sickness, maternity/paternity, employers NI is free to the client?
    Aware of that. Luckily, current client manager also sees it this way but not all do. A lot will look at what you're getting as the contractor which leads to very little sympathy if you moan about tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAccountant View Post
    Plus costs of recruitment / redundancy / sex discrimination / race discrimination / unfair dismissal
    That costs a fortune in itself. Someone starts (recruitment cost £50K), then claims discrimination (after having 6 months off on full pay with "stress") and gets a huge payout, usually many times their annual salary, plus legal costs to the client. Happens all the time in big companies.

    Contractor, hire and fire, no rights, use and abuse. Client quids in everytime.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X