Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
All burglaries were investigated, but some in odd-numbered premises didn't get a visit from a forensic examiner, unless they involved a vulnerable person, or there were obvious signs of evidence to be gathered, or there was a pattern of similar crimes in the area. And it was only a trial, which has already ended. And it had no discernible effect on detection rates.
As a Leicester resident at an odd-numbered address, I'm not actually that bothered now I know the facts of the matter. I'm more pissed off with this crappy government for cutting funding to the police service so much that it has to waste time buggering about with experiments like this, particularly given that the hypocritical Tory bastards love to present themselves as "tough on crime".
You can get a more balanced idea of the facts from this report in the local rag: Police accused of ignoring odd-number home burglary victims | Leicester Mercury
The reporter who wrote that is a pub acquaintance of mine, and unlike the shoddy hacks at the Telegraph he's a competent and trustworthy journalist. (I'm not so sure about the sub who write the linkbait headline.)
Leave a comment: