Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Are we repeating same mistakes as 1930s?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Are we repeating same mistakes as 1930s?"
Collapse
-
They want to get rid of the army altogether and replace it with something that would make Dad's Army look like a crack special forces unit.
-
Bollox! Greens have the right idea on defense(except nuclear deterrent). We only need enough defense to defend our country.Originally posted by Flashman View PostSpend more on Defence you feckwitts! We need the SC cleared jobs...oh and it might help defend the country.
Leave a comment:
-
Spend more on Defence you feckwitts! We need the SC cleared jobs...oh and it might help defend the country.
Leave a comment:
-
That would be unthinkable!!!Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostChurchill did not want to stop at Berlin in 45.
We should have listened.
Leave a comment:
-
They could eventually but not by the end of 1945 (if my memory serves correctly!).Originally posted by minestrone View PostI'm happy to use 'we' in that context.
I also don't for a second believe that they could not have produced 3 more bombs in that period.
Leave a comment:
-
[emoji102]Originally posted by minestrone View PostGermany now has more control over Europe that it did in 1943. Greece does not negotiate it's budget with the EU, it negotiates it with Germany. Merkel is now "open to discussion" over the United Kingdom's immigration policy.
We should have nuked Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad in 45.
Leave a comment:
-
But surely by the time they'd have enough ships to need that many top brass, the existing ones will have died of old ageOriginally posted by Goatfell View PostThat old chestnut again.
You can build a ship and train an able seaman pretty quickly, you can't magic an experienced admiral out of thin air.
Leave a comment:
-
That old chestnut again.Originally posted by Troll View PostWe still have more Admirals, Vice Admirals & Captains than surface vessels - 40 Admirals & 260 Captains would appear to be a tad too many for 19 ships!
You can build a ship and train an able seaman pretty quickly, you can't magic an experienced admiral out of thin air.
Leave a comment:
-
We still have more Admirals, Vice Admirals & Captains than surface vessels - 40 Admirals & 260 Captains would appear to be a tad too many for 19 ships!Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostOur defence cuts leave us looking feeble in the eyes of the world - Telegraph
We are appeasing our enemies and making the same mistakes as in the 1930s during the rise of Nazism
I disagree. We have a nuclear deterrent. However we are repeating same mistakes as 1920s. Gap between rich and poor is widening all the time.
Leave a comment:
-
Churchill did not want to stop at Berlin in 45.Originally posted by minestrone View PostGermany now has more control over Europe that it did in 1943. Greece does not negotiate it's budget with the EU, it negotiates it with Germany. Merkel is now "open to discussion" over the United Kingdom's immigration policy.
We should have nuked Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad in 45.
We should have listened.
Leave a comment:
-
The B29's were all deployed in the Pacific and by the time of the bombing missions the Japanese had very few fighters left, even less experienced pilots still alive and the approach was all over the sea. The soviets had plenty of fighters, including high altitude ones, lots of veteran pilots and a decent air defence network.Originally posted by minestrone View PostThe Enola Gay had flight radius of 2900 miles.
Even if they could have assembled a number of weapons (doubtful as plutonium was a sod to get) delivery would have at best been hugely doubtful and with the Soviet military fully mobilised the consequences would have been appalling.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostTrue, plus the delivery would have been more than a trivial challenge, it's a long way to those cities from areas not controlled by the Soviets at the time.
The Enola Gay had flight radius of 2900 miles.
Leave a comment:
-
You can thank activist central bank policy for the latter.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostOur defence cuts leave us looking feeble in the eyes of the world - Telegraph
We are appeasing our enemies and making the same mistakes as in the 1930s during the rise of Nazism
I disagree. We have a nuclear deterrent. However we are repeating same mistakes as 1920s. Gap between rich and poor is widening all the time.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: