Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Dealing with Council Planners
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Dealing with Council Planners"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Troll View Post*Update*
Despite best efforts- my trusty spread sheet of costs versus sales only shows a profit of £1.1 million at the end- which when split between 3 brothers and subject to taxes doesn't appear to be a worthwhile exercise bearing in mind the associated hassles
It may be that a pukka developer can attack costs and extract more value but I think the best option would be to put into an Auction with a £1 million reserve and see if there is any interest
Leave a comment:
-
*Update*
Despite best efforts- my trusty spread sheet of costs versus sales only shows a profit of £1.1 million at the end- which when split between 3 brothers and subject to taxes doesn't appear to be a worthwhile exercise bearing in mind the associated hassles
It may be that a pukka developer can attack costs and extract more value but I think the best option would be to put into an Auction with a £1 million reserve and see if there is any interest
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostWhat they do round by me is that the developer buys the property and removes just enough of the supporting structure so that it starts to fall apart over the next 12 months.
12 months later planning agree that a total rebuild is allowed.
Takes time but based on the number of properties it's quite obviously happened to, it must be worth it.
Seriously worth considering.
Happened next to my dads where a listed barn collapsed, to be replaced by a house, a couple of years down the line.
This was right in the middle of rural Herefordshire, would never have got planning otherwise.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostWhat they do round by me is that the developer buys the property and removes just enough of the supporting structure so that it starts to fall apart over the next 12 months.
12 months later planning agree that a total rebuild is allowed.
Takes time but based on the number of properties it's quite obviously happened to, it must be worth it.
Leave a comment:
-
What they do round by me is that the developer buys the property and removes just enough of the supporting structure so that it starts to fall apart over the next 12 months.
12 months later planning agree that a total rebuild is allowed.
Takes time but based on the number of properties it's quite obviously happened to, it must be worth it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Troll View PostDon't mind annoying Council twunts - but not worth a criminal record
AYCOTBAC?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostEver heard of an "accidental" fire engulfing a visiting council planner
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostEver heard of an "accidental" fire
Don't mind annoying Council twunts - but not worth a criminal record
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Troll View PostAlso how peeved off they get about an unannounced demolition
Leave a comment:
-
Been pondering this some more after a site visit over the break.
To get the property habitable and sellable requires total gutting- reroofing - rebuild of gable ends remedial work to other walls re wiring et et-bleedin-cetera - fag packet estimate of costs is circa 300k
Seems one approach to satisfy the local ConservationNaziofficer would be to pseudo demolish leaving a front façade supported by steelwork frame while the walls are rebuilt etc.
But if that is the plan then may as well demolish the lot as the worst case scenario is they force a rebuild
So bearing in mind this is only a "building of local interest" listing and not an English Heritage jobbie - besides peeving off the local conservation twot (who I don't think has any statutory powers) - we could demolish without permission having gutted and sold all the period features contained within the building (staircases, fireplaces panelling doors etc) this would help to offset the costs of the demolition and rebuild if required
Suppose it's all about how precious the council is of a view of an 1800's building from the main road as to whether they will force a rebuild
Also how peeved off they get about an unannounced demolition
Leave a comment:
-
They can be a PITA but then you have to bear in mind the kind of abominations and thoughtless stupidity many people would build if left unchecked.
The UK stance on preservation of listed buildings - what you use rather than whether it looks right - is not very sensible but then you don't have to buy a listed building, and again you will get people tearing down gorgeous old buildings to build grotty flats otherwise - like how 1000-year-old trees used to get pulled down just to harvest their fruit because it was cheaper/easier.
It's a balancing act.
Leave a comment:
-
Council planners are bellends. Had a garage conversion planned. Nobhead neighbour tried to prevent it - because he could and he is a total sad case. His argument was I drove over his grass once (by about 5cm) so if I got rid of my garage I might do it more!
Council said sorry you're taking away a parking space so you need to replace it. Bear in mind, this was a garage on a modern house - 1 ft gap either side of the car so we never ever used it.
So I said, OK theres two spaces in front, and I've chippings over the garden so that makes an extra space. No good its got to be a permanent space.
So I searched recent planning for garage conversions. Found two in next street who still had just the two spaces. So I said well you let them do it. Ah ok then. Cracking way to run things....
Incidentally, said neighbour has got a huge RV that he parks on the street. Fair enough, its a taxed vehicle etc but seems a bit much to moan about someone elses parking when you've got a large additional vehicle on the street.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYes those homeless refugees love ruining houses.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: