Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Like his fellow press-loathing mate Brand – and the absurd 'Bishop' Hugh Grant for that matter - Coogan preaches from the high altar of ethics and morality, whilst privately preferring to wallow in the complete opposite social strata.
For the record, I personally don't give a monkey's cuss about their sex lives, and nor, I suspect, do any current tabloid newspaper editors.
Their combined ability to sell newspapers based on their ageing lothario libidos wouldn't be even as tenth as commercially interesting as that of Joey Essex from TOWIE.
But I do care about their flagrantly self-interested attempts to try and influence the UK general election.
Why on earth should we listen to a couple of rich, bored, hypocritical comedians try to dictate where we cast our vote – particularly when one of them told us voting was pointless?
I don't agree with much that David Cameron ever says about anything. He's always struck me as the worst kind of PR-speaking, slimy creep who will say and do anything for power.
But he was right when he called Russell Brand 'a joke'.
Only the joke's on all of us.
Both guilty of being loaded, drug takers, shagging prostitutes and excess, but wish to point out how morally virtuous they are when it comes to Socialism.
Indistinguishable from a lot of politicians with that minor edit. Whole system is borked. Might need a reboot
Both of these hypocrites are seeking assuage their guilt and make themselves look morally virtuous and thus justify their own personal fortunes. They want to protect themselves from being accused of being rich. What is even more iniquitous is that these people want to condemn everyone else to lives iof state dependency, broken economies and the suppression of aspiration (the poor are regarded as victims not future IT contractors, engineers or doctors, actors or comedians). In other words they have reached the top of their careers and they wish to remain unchallenged.
Both guilty of being loaded, drug takers, shagging prostitutes and excess, but wish to point out how morally virtuous they are when it comes to Socialism.
Both of these hypocrites are in support of Labour merely as a self-guilt assuaging fashion accessory to make them feel not so bad about their wealth.They want to protect themselves from being accused of being rich. What is even more iniquitous is that these people want to condemn everyone else to lives iof state dependency, broken economies and the suppression of aspiration (the poor are regarded as victims not future IT contractors, engineers or doctors, actors or comedians). In other words they have reached the top of their careers and they wish to remain unchallenged.
Leave a comment: