• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Why BTL will never fail in the UK"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    When stek's Dad said it, before we were all hyper-morbidly obese, adults needed 2 square feet, and toddlers less. 1 square metre contains 10.764 square feat, or 5.382 people, so we could squeeze in just over 2 billion, the world population in, er, 1927.
    You've been to India and China? Or you're so provincially small-minded that to you westerners are all the people there are?

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    You shouldn't believe him
    The Isle of Wight is 380 square kilometers which is 380,000,000 square meters
    Assuming that there are 7 billion people (It may already be 8 billion or more) and they all would need 1 square meter each, you're 6.62 billion square meters short (or 17.4 Isle of Wights)

    BTW the smell would be horrendous 3 people dying every second and all the human excrements accumulating
    When stek's Dad said it, before we were all hyper-morbidly obese, adults needed 2 square feet, and toddlers less. 1 square metre contains 10.764 square feat, or 5.382 people, so we could squeeze in just over 2 billion, the world population in, er, 1927. Conclusion: Stek is old.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    Or one FatLazyContractor per 4 sqm
    But people can stand on top, like a bouncy castle of sorts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why do they need 1 square meter each? I reckon you could cram people into 1/8 of a square metre
    Or one FatLazyContractor per 4 sqm

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Why do they need 1 square meter each? I reckon you could cram people into 1/8 of a square metre on average... 2 billion Asians are on average pretty small and kids are too - or could be held by parents.

    We only need 2 IoW.

    Leave a comment:


  • Avalonia
    replied
    The only way we could get concessions is if we threatened to leave and meant it. Dave and his fellow ' conservatives ' are hopeless Europhiles . He will fail

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    My dad once told me you could fit all the people in the world on the Isle of Wight and still have room to spare.

    Mind you, he also assured me spaghetti was made from worms....
    You shouldn't believe him
    The Isle of Wight is 380 square kilometers which is 380,000,000 square meters
    Assuming that there are 7 billion people (It may already be 8 billion or more) and they all would need 1 square meter each, you're 6.62 billion square meters short (or 17.4 Isle of Wights)

    BTW the smell would be horrendous 3 people dying every second and all the human excrements accumulating
    Last edited by Eirikur; 14 April 2015, 11:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
    We live in a country where people move to France for the quality of life! I wonder if the fact that France has 105 people per km whereas England has 419 people per km has anything to do with it?
    Or perhaps it's the wine, the cheese, the warmer weather, etc... people have been moving to France for decades. If you want to live in the quiet countryside in the UK, you are spoilt for choice. So many exceeding beautiful areas.

    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    he is wanting to renegotiate open borders with he EU then have a vote.

    It is a reasonably sensible approach to the problem.
    Originally posted by Avalonia View Post
    This will NEVER happen
    Why? Everything is up for negotiation, if you have something the other side wants. The EU doesn't want the UK to leave... look how much fuss they are making about Greece leaving and they are useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZARDOZ
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    MigrationWatchUK | Latest Immigration Statistics

    Notice the highest immigration ever under our "tough on immigration" Tory overlords.
    We can't be that far off a big epidemic all the signs are there for large transmission:

    Mass immigration
    Overcrowding in cities
    Disease resistance to vaccines/ Re-emergence of diseases presumed to be controlled

    It's going to happen just a question of when and how big

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by alluvial View Post
    Yes, 0.5% doesn't sound like much does it?
    Or we could say, approx. 6% of the population of Scotland, 10% of the population of Wales, or 16% of the population of Northern Ireland. Sounds a tad higher then.

    Or how about twice the population of Brighton? Or a tad under the population of Cardiff?

    Or even, nearly 8 times the population of the county that I live in?

    Sounds a bit bigger then doesn't it?

    Thing is, you can convert any number to a percentage of something else to make it fit in with your own viewpoint but all that happens is that, whilst you get a slap on the back from the other left wing "let them all come and be given succour" types for showing things as they "really are", you actually just make yourself seem just a little bit of a tit.
    It's not to fit to any viewpoint, the relevant statistic is net migration to the UK so the comparison is against existing UK population. Not the population of Wales, the number of girls who have laughed at your penis, or the number of pens you can stick up your nose at once.

    % growth is the important metric, not absolute numbers. If all the immigrants move to the same town, that is relevant. Just as it would be if all the emigrants left the same town.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by gables View Post
    Also, thinking about it, it's only certain areas of the UK that are overcrowded, where I live it's not crowded at all.. :-)
    Is that because no one wants to live there?

    Leave a comment:


  • gables
    replied
    Also, thinking about it, it's only certain areas of the UK that are overcrowded, where I live it's not crowded at all.. :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Avalonia
    replied
    he is wanting to renegotiate
    This will NEVER happen

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    he is wanting to renegotiate open borders with he EU then have a vote.

    It is a reasonably sensible approach to the problem.
    Makes sense to the Tory party. Everyone else in the EU? Stupid Brits again. Freedom of movement is a fundamental right in the EU.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    According to the papers we also have the highest growth in Europe, the best healthcare, etc, etc. So what even if we are the most crowded - someone has to be and that doesn't mean it's something to be avoided intrinsically.
    We live in a country where people move to France for the quality of life! I wonder if the fact that France has 105 people per km whereas England has 419 people per km has anything to do with it?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X