Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I once saw a 1970's Volvo that had run a little wide on a tight bend near Haydon Bridge, its front right corner hit the front right corner of a car coming the other way. The other car was a Rolls Royce and was a little scratched, the Volvo was totalled!
at 2-2.5 ton the Roller is going to be at least 50% heavier than any Volvo and god knows how much stronger. Bit of a bargain classic these days...Here's one that used to belong to Nigela Lawson, seat sniffers need not apply
May have been true in the 70s 80s...
But, that model of Saab is effectively a Vauxhall Vectra in a dress..so more of a shed a wheels.
Likely the McClaren picked up most of the damage when it was spinning around hitting things
I once saw a 1970's Volvo that had run a little wide on a tight bend near Haydon Bridge, its front right corner hit the front right corner of a car coming the other way. The other car was a Rolls Royce and was a little scratched, the Volvo was totalled!
Saw that, the mclaren didnt look good. But the passenger compartment didnt show any signs of collapse so I guess the crumple zones worked. Bit surprised the body panel effectively disintegrated so much. Mind saabs \ volvos were not known as tanks on wheels for nothing.
Exactly - no cabin intrusion and lots of dissipated energy would be a good thing for those driving. I once saw a collection of 1930's era crash investigation photos - most of those cars looked like they just needed a bit of T-Cut, but many were fatal accidents.
Saw that, the mclaren didnt look good. But the passenger compartment didnt show any signs of collapse so I guess the crumple zones worked. Bit surprised the body panel effectively disintegrated so much. Mind saabs \ volvos were not known as tanks on wheels for nothing.
Leave a comment: