Reply to: The sycophantic love in for the moderators thread

[Moderator]

Its almost as if NAT now has a sockie of his own..

That would be a gross abuse of the system.

[eek]

That was predictable.

Its almost as if NAT now has a sockie of his own..

[mudskipper]

There is no registered member called "moderator" so I think he's in the clear

Ban them all, that's what I say.

And I am a GOD in this matter.

That was predictable.

[NotAllThere]

There is no registered member called "moderator" so I think he's in the clear

But I've often been called a member. Or something similar anyway...

[Moderator]

Ban them all, that's what I say.

And I am a GOD in this matter.

[SimonMac]

I'm sure there was some rule about starting a thread to deliberately offend a member...

There is no registered member called "moderator" so I think he's in the clear

[eek]

Yeah - but it was clearly designed to provoke insult. The bastard.

You assume suity has the ability to see or think through the consequences of his actions....

[MarillionFan]

Yeah - but it was clearly designed to provoke insult. The bastard.

Nah. You're skin's thicker than an elephant picked in vinegar.

[NotAllThere]

There is - this doesn't meet it as the first post isn't an insult.... I know the rules are random but they aren't that difficult. Even a like Suity knows how to create an insult thread in a way that meets the rules....

Yeah - but it was clearly designed to provoke insult. The bastard.

[suityou01]

Oops

[eek]

I'm sure there was some rule about starting a thread to deliberately offend a member...

There is - this doesn't meet it as the first post isn't an insult.... I know the rules are random but they aren't that difficult. Even a like Suity knows how to create an insult thread in a way that meets the rules....

[NotAllThere]

I'm sure there was some rule about starting a thread to deliberately offend a member...

[SimonMac]

[SimonMac]

[SimonMac]