• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Palace steps up Andrew denials"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    That was a headline waiting to happen.

    I'm only surprised it took so long.

    Or was it done to death back in the 80s?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Do you recall as a child the secret to a good lie would be to offer continuous denial?
    It's also a good tactic when you're accused of something you didn't do of course. Claiming you're not a witch doesn't prove it either way

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    What's the difference between the Queen and Prince Andrew?

    He makes you get down on both knees.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    My Website
    You work for the US government? Intriguing.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Duke of York strenuously denies he had ten thousand men

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Indeed. The only shaggable prince is Harry, although he's a bit too young for me. I guess he takes after his father
    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post

    Humm... consistant...
    I don't want to know what the woman in the background is doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied


    Humm... consistant...


    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Looking on the positive side, it should stop the gay rumours. He's still a shape-shifting alien lizard though.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Indeed. The only shaggable prince is Harry, although he's a bit too young for me. I guess he takes after his father
    Who's that then?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    I'm a married woman.
    So, yes please then?

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You'd say no?
    I'm a married woman.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    While monarchy has not been without influence, Parliament has been responsible for all laws in the UK since late 17th century.
    Responsible, yes for sure, why would monarchy want to be held responsible for all that tulip?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Indeed. The only shaggable prince is Harry, although he's a bit too young for me. I guess he takes after his father
    You'd say no?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    So you credit great elected Leaders like Bliar?
    What the???? So the fact that Bliar was a total dickhead means Queen Elizabeth was actually in charge??

    While monarchy has not been without influence, Parliament has been responsible for all laws in the UK since late 17th century.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X