
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: More kids and guns
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "More kids and guns"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostSeriously?
A criminal is going to rob your house or you regardless. If they think you are armed, then they are definitely going to armed.
If they think you might shoot. They will shoot first.
It's a simple cycle-of-violence.
If having a heavily armed population resulted in a low crime rate then the USA would be much safer than it is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostBut, but, that's no good when "they" burst into the office with AKs & uzis.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostI think the idea that a defended house results in an armed robber is ridiculous.
Seriously?
A criminal is going to rob your house or you regardless. If they think you are armed, then they are definitely going to armed.
If they think you might shoot. They will shoot first.
It's a simple cycle-of-violence.
If having a heavily armed population resulted in a low crime rate then the USA would be much safer than it is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe only good thing about this thread is that the stupid people in it are safely in the UK away from all the guns they seem to think are a good idea.
Leave a comment:
-
The only good thing about this thread is that the stupid people in it are safely in the UK away from all the guns they seem to think are a good idea.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostIf you're a burglar, and you think the homeowner is likely to have a loaded gun, you're going to take a gun. Most burglars in the UK don't come armed with guns and will run away if discovered.
I think the idea that a defended house results in an armed robber is ridiculous. It's like suggesting that a robber who knows that a house is occupied by a champion kickboxer will bring a champion thai boxer with him on his robbery, rather than just rob the neighbours instead. Except that bringing the thai-boxer is more credible as the potential loss is smaller for the same potential gain. An armed confrontation only increases the potential loss without increasing the potential gain.
It's basic economics, and violence is very expensive.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostNow here's some people you really wouldn't want to burgle in a hurry:
Charles Ommanney looks at the many faces of gun owners in the United States (Photos).
You certainly don't want to mess with Millicent Hunter.
Leave a comment:
-
If you're a burglar, and you think the homeowner is likely to have a loaded gun, you're going to take a gun. Most burglars in the UK don't come armed with guns and will run away if discovered.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post...
In countries where gun worship is legal they tend to come when they think that you're out, because the robbery isn;t worth the chance of someone shooting at you. In this country they just hit you over the head with a metal bar if you put up a fight. ...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostBurglars beat pensioner to death in front of wife | Daily Mail Online
Took me all of 3 seconds to google. I posted the link because clearly you're from a different country, if not planet.
Here's another which took another 3 seconds:
Armed robbers steal cash and phones in raid on Iceland in Altrincham - Manchester Evening News
BTW: I chose California for the Google as it has roughly the same population as the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostWow. Your personal anecdotes are now the objective standard? Lol.
And you can't read either - my point is, again, that you wouldn't NEED to shoot them.
In countries where gun ownership is legal they tend to come when they think that you're out, because the robbery isn;t worth the chance of someone shooting at you. In this country they just hit you over the head with a metal bar if you put up a fight. If you;re unlucky you get it anyway. Either way you have to suffer the experience.
It seems a bit ironic that you are throwing stones at Sue Ellen and respond with exactly the same type of argument.
Again, I've lived half of my life in both the UK and the US. The UK is much safer by far. Due in no small part to the gun licensing and regulation in the UK. I know this doesn't fit your view of how society should work, but it does seem to work.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghost
Hardly. IIRC there were estimated to be about a million illegally held handguns, there are now estimated to be about 3 million illegally held handguns.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jmo21 View PostEh?
My post is an argument AGAINST teachers (or the general public carrying guns).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostYour points are guns make society safer. You also seem preoccupied with the fact you can't shoot intruders in the UK or wave a gun around to frighten them.
As someone who had an intruder in her house the fact he got disturbed by voices was enough to make him flee. No guns needed let alone any other violence needed. If guns were legal he would have come armed.* Even in other cases I know intruders didn't use violence.
*He was caught while trying to flee and had nothing on him.
And you can't read either - my point is, again, that you wouldn't NEED to shoot them.
In countries where gun ownership is legal they tend to come when they think that you're out, because the robbery isn;t worth the chance of someone shooting at you. In this country they just hit you over the head with a metal bar if you put up a fight. If you;re unlucky you get it anyway. Either way you have to suffer the experience.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: