• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Where is all this money coming from?"

Collapse

  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by fitzy73 View Post
    "Money" doesn't really exist. Debt exists. Do you remember the run on Northern Rock? Do you know about deposit ratios?

    Its all debt man. And, as the ECB and BoE have shown, they can magic it up when ever they want to.

    Equally, it could all be written off in a single stroke.

    Once we left the gold standard, money as you know it is just a promise.

    And promises are broken, amended, elongated all the time.


    That's the long answer. Short one is govt bond's.
    Money exists for those unborn children who one day grow up with a debt they didn't incur.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by fitzy73 View Post
    "Money" doesn't really exist. Debt exists. .
    That is exactly what I tell my contractors when they start moaning about not getting paid

    Leave a comment:


  • fitzy73
    replied
    "Money" doesn't really exist. Debt exists. Do you remember the run on Northern Rock? Do you know about deposit ratios?

    Its all debt man. And, as the ECB and BoE have shown, they can magic it up when ever they want to.

    Equally, it could all be written off in a single stroke.

    Once we left the gold standard, money as you know it is just a promise.

    And promises are broken, amended, elongated all the time.


    That's the long answer. Short one is govt bond's.

    Leave a comment:


  • PerfectStorm
    replied
    Umbrella company travel expenses

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    MF gobsmacked and outraged by the stamp duty changes, and the very same day someone throws a drunken strop on a plane?

    Anyone else joining up the dots here?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    MF gobsmacked and outraged by the stamp duty changes, and the very same day someone throws a drunken strop on a plane?

    Anyone else joining up the dots here?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    tax the rich!!
    And MF

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by marillionfan View Post
    my house purchase.

    Osbourne, you ****.
    tax the rich!!

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by tractor View Post
    2.5bn for the NHS
    15bn for roads
    1bn loans guarantee for small businesses
    Extra billions for the EU.
    My house purchase.

    Osbourne, you ****.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    The unborn.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickyBoy View Post
    Zero hour contracts wouldn't be too bad without the exclusions that lock people into a single employer.

    Being able to be on the books of a dozen companies and being able to fill in your week with work for any of them would significantly reduce the down side of these contracts.

    We really need legislation for low-skilled zero hour contracts that enforce an 'on call' fee if they are exclusive, to encourage the use of non-exclusive contracts that allow flexibility for the employer and the employed.

    At the moment, we the tax payers are effectively footing the bill for the 'on call' payments
    The employers would just discriminate against those people by not offering them work. But it would be a start.

    Paying half a day for showing up and getting no work would be another. Not allowing them to force the employee or self employed to pay for protective clothing or overpriced vans or stock might be another.

    The solution to Zero hour contracts is to have a shortage of potential employees then companies will treat staff better and pay them better.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by NickyBoy View Post
    Zero hour contracts wouldn't be too bad without the exclusions that lock people into a single employer.
    Agreed, but in reality, employers that hire temps will remember the ones that are available when they're needed and put them to the top of the pile. You can't really stop that.

    We really need legislation for low-skilled zero hour contracts that enforce an 'on call' fee if they are exclusive, to encourage the use of non-exclusive contracts that allow flexibility for the employer and the employed.
    Cue lots of moaning about people being forced to accept below minimum wage pay for the times they're not needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickyBoy
    replied
    Zero hour contracts wouldn't be too bad without the exclusions that lock people into a single employer.

    Being able to be on the books of a dozen companies and being able to fill in your week with work for any of them would significantly reduce the down side of these contracts.

    We really need legislation for low-skilled zero hour contracts that enforce an 'on call' fee if they are exclusive, to encourage the use of non-exclusive contracts that allow flexibility for the employer and the employed.

    At the moment, we the tax payers are effectively footing the bill for the 'on call' payments
    Last edited by NickyBoy; 3 December 2014, 13:40.

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Least you aren't a passive racist....
    I hate mange tout and asparagus, does that count?

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    There is an overall saving as there's benefit to the economy at large by having more people making and doing useful things, which is good for everyone, and increases tax receipts (if only in Belgium).
    But not to the taxpayer, which was my point. If I am paying the same or more tax what does it matter that other people are spending more (which is arguable anyway)? It is just massaging the available money.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X