Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Step aside Marty, it’s our turn
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Step aside Marty, it’s our turn"
Collapse
-
Clearly the optional extras (jets and tow ropes) were clever marketing in that case.
-
Technically, it didn't stop when it passed over water, it just ran out of momentum. I think you end up having the 'aeroplane on a treadmill' discussion.Originally posted by barrydidit View PostIf Suity wrote the requirements yes, but it wouldn't have passed UAT since it didn't actually move anywhere.
Leave a comment:
-
If Suity wrote the requirements yes, but it wouldn't have passed UAT since it didn't actually move anywhere.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIt worked on water. Its purpose was to hover and it did
Leave a comment:
-
It worked on water. Its purpose was to hover and it didOriginally posted by barrydidit View PostI seem to recall the hoverboard didn't work on water either - it was the Biff Tannon character's whose did as it had little rockets and tow ropes for his gang whose hover boards also didn't have rockets.
Leave a comment:
-
They've still got a year to sort it.Originally posted by Halo Jones View Post
Given yesterday's date I suspect there's no coincidence.
Back to the Future Countdown to October 21, 2015
Leave a comment:
-
I seem to recall the hoverboard didn't work on water either - it was the Biff Tannon character's whose did as it had little rockets and tow ropes for his gang whose hover boards also didn't have rockets.Ever since the fictional hoverboards in 1989’s Back to the Future Part II children (and adults) have dreamed of scooting along six inches from the ground, safe from the rough terrain and water which would stop a normal skateboard in its tracks.
Leave a comment:
-
Step aside Marty, it’s our turn
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Leave a comment: