• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How you should describe the Lib Dems?"

Collapse

  • Batcher
    replied
    Originally posted by jemb View Post
    are you not?
    No, He's a high end tax avoider

    Leave a comment:


  • jemb
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    Like you're a high end tax payer......
    are you not?

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by jemb View Post
    Yup. The SNP are the best of an inadequate bunch. They spout a lot, but do little. For example, they could raise tax to re-fund the NHS, but they don't because they know it would be a vote loser.
    They are just 'ok' administrators.

    As for the UK economy, it's not doing too bad. Us high end tax payers are certainly doing fine.
    Like you're a high end tax payer......

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    but do little
    Aren't politicians who do bugger all the best ones? My favourite PM was Lord Home. Didn't do a darn thing while he was in office that I recall and we were the better for it. Didn't cock things up like Blair or Heath at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • jemb
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    So, you want the SNP to run your country in a limited way but prefer the 'sound financial experience' of George Osborne to oversee the big decisions !

    Yup, that makes sense !
    Yup. The SNP are the best of an inadequate bunch. They spout a lot, but do little. For example, they could raise tax to re-fund the NHS, but they don't because they know it would be a vote loser.
    They are just 'ok' administrators.

    As for the UK economy, it's not doing too bad. Us high end tax payers are certainly doing fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • jemb
    replied
    Redwood. I may have been a bit hasty.....

    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Evidence?
    Well - there you go.
    Redwood used to support charging in the NHS and deeper levels of privatisation. But I had a look at his site and these thoughts are not there.
    So I rang his office and was told that his thoughts have developed since his famous 1988 pamphlet (released with Letwin) and he now supports an NHS free at the point of delivery.

    The next election will be fought on the NHS and the economy. Cameron has history with the former and appears to be nailing the latter.
    His son, Ivan, could never have been treated privately (given the nature of his disability) and Cameron is known to have seen the real benefit the NHS supplies. It’s one story he can tell with credibility.

    I’m a lefty, taxation is good - but do I trust Labour to spend it well? Nope. Do I trust the Tories to tax the right people? Errr No.
    Liberals? Tossers.
    UKIP? Fat middle aged men.
    Greens taking seats from the Libs
    SNP taking seats from Labour.
    The next election has six variables - it’s going to be very interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Good points

    Good job I'm not in charge of NHS policy then. But I reckon Suity couldn't make things any worse
    Are you bringing Suity up in reference to fatties, boob jobs, or both?

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by NickyBoy View Post
    Gastric bands save money in the long run, when we don't have to deal with the fat f**ker being fat any more.

    You can deny them a band on principle and then end up paying more when they are treated for a heart attack, or you can bite the bullet and apply preventative medicine that saves us money in the long run.

    Boob reductions can likewise prevent spiralling long-term costs from cancer and back injuries.

    That's why big sweeping statements about any public service are bloody stupid and you should be instantly suspicious of anyone who proposes to 'fix' them with simple common sense changes. Common sense is only good for fixing common problems and juggling a national service is anything but common.
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Letting the dangerously obese die would not exactly look good on the website either.
    Good points

    Good job I'm not in charge of NHS policy then. But I reckon Suity couldn't make things any worse

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Indeed. But I'm thinking that the nation needs to reset its expectations about the NHS because the budget continues to run out of control.

    NHS website says 1 in 20 hospital deaths is preventable. That's quite a lot. Maybe boob jobs and gastric bands for fat f**kers could be restricted to save lives.
    Letting the dangerously obese die would not exactly look good on the website either.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickyBoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Indeed. But I'm thinking that the nation needs to reset its expectations about the NHS because the budget continues to run out of control.

    NHS website says 1 in 20 hospital deaths is preventable. That's quite a lot. Maybe boob jobs and gastric bands for fat f**kers could be restricted to save lives.
    Gastric bands save money in the long run, when we don't have to deal with the fat f**ker being fat any more.

    You can deny them a band on principle and then end up paying more when they are treated for a heart attack, or you can bite the bullet and apply preventative medicine that saves us money in the long run.

    Boob reductions can likewise prevent spiralling long-term costs from cancer and back injuries.

    That's why big sweeping statements about any public service are bloody stupid and you should be instantly suspicious of anyone who proposes to 'fix' them with simple common sense changes. Common sense is only good for fixing common problems and juggling a national service is anything but common.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    That would be a stupid thing thing to say even by the standards of politicians.
    Indeed. But I'm thinking that the nation needs to reset its expectations about the NHS because the budget continues to run out of control.

    NHS website says 1 in 20 hospital deaths is preventable. That's quite a lot. Maybe boob jobs and gastric bands for fat f**kers could be restricted to save lives.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    However now people seem to think they should be able to get free tit jobs or that A&E is somewhere to go when you cannot be arsed to go to work.
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    If only, if ONLY, a politician had the balls to say this
    That would be a stupid thing thing to say even by the standards of politicians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    the NHS was initially formed to give basic healthcare for all - to make sure no one died of easily treatable diseases.

    However now people seem to think they should be able to get free tit jobs or that A&E is somewhere to go when you cannot be arsed to go to work.
    If only, if ONLY, a politician had the balls to say this

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Any politician who does not pledge to give the NHS an unending supply of money is always accused of 'running the NHS into the ground'

    The problem for me was that the NHS was initially formed to give basic healthcare for all - to make sure no one died of easily treatable diseases.

    However now people seem to think they should be able to get free tit jobs or that A&E is somewhere to go when you cannot be arsed to go to work.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    That was rather my point.
    I am sometimes not the sharpest tool in the box

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X