• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Travel expenses for on site interview"

Collapse

  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    You work behind a glory hole?
    He is the glory hole.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by dty View Post
    By doing Skype interviews?
    You would still smell this guy

    Leave a comment:


  • dty
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    How he got any work I'll never know.
    By doing Skype interviews?

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    Thankfully, I've not had to do a face-to-face interview for many years now
    You work behind a glory hole?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by tarbera View Post
    agree completly no need to F2F techies as the most retarded/stinky looking ones are normally the best.
    I once worked with a guy who stunk the place out and was rubbish. He spat when he talked and he did it so much while talking to a colleague who was eating their lunch that they had to throw it away

    How he got any work I'll never know.

    Leave a comment:


  • tarbera
    replied
    agreed

    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    Many of my techie colleagues have serious personality issues, ranging from atrocious personal hygiene to an inability to communicate face to face. For some roles, that is OK, but for some it's not, and a face to face is what you need to screen out the weirdos. If anyone doesn't recognise that, they're probably one of the weirdos.
    agree completly no need to F2F techies as the most retarded/stinky looking ones are normally the best.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    Thankfully, I've not had to do a face-to-face interview for many years now
    If they've met you before, who can blame them?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    Many of my techie colleagues have serious personality issues, ranging from atrocious personal hygiene to an inability to communicate face to face. For some roles, that is OK, but for some it's not, and a face to face is what you need to screen out the weirdos. If anyone doesn't recognise that, they're probably one of the weirdos.
    Thankfully, I've not had to do a face-to-face interview for many years now

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    If the role involves lots of interaction with people, then it can be useful to see how people actually react to being in that kind of environment rather than just seeing how they look over a video call.

    If the client says "I want a face to face interview" and the applicant says "how about Skype instead?" then I can see how some clients might wonder what they are hiding that they don't want to come in.
    Many of my techie colleagues have serious personality issues, ranging from atrocious personal hygiene to an inability to communicate face to face. For some roles, that is OK, but for some it's not, and a face to face is what you need to screen out the weirdos. If anyone doesn't recognise that, they're probably one of the weirdos.

    Leave a comment:


  • speling bee
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    Oh, please let this be possible. Pretty please. You know you want to.
    Better to let the OP post only in the NTRT thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by kingcook View Post
    Why would you prefer to them to be physically present? Would you need to touch them up or something?
    If the role involves lots of interaction with people, then it can be useful to see how people actually react to being in that kind of environment rather than just seeing how they look over a video call.

    If the client says "I want a face to face interview" and the applicant says "how about Skype instead?" then I can see how some clients might wonder what they are hiding that they don't want to come in.

    Leave a comment:


  • kal
    replied
    Can you not justify the ban due to the fact that this is Contractor UK and he obviously fails the residency requirements

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by Scruff View Post
    Let him back, but only let him post in General.
    Oh, please let this be possible. Pretty please. You know you want to.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    He is just a tw4t so can't help himself. Time are tough in Magyar?

    Let him back, but only let him post in General.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by Dactylion View Post
    Can I jut get this straight?

    He was originally banned for being a sockie.
    He then convinced Admin that he wasn't a sockie but was a real person.
    You then decided that he was an arrogant twunt and banned him again.

    How long has being an arrogant twunt been grounds for banning?
    No, he was permabanned when I thought he was being a sockie, he then complained to Admin.

    And I'm pondering whether or not to let him back.

    (But eek's right being an arrogant taunt has been bannable forever, it's just how far you're prepared to push it. Just look at flipFlop. One if the biggest twunts around here and I've actually unbanned him.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X