Thanks for those responses.
I won't abuse you as we're not in General, but, you know what I'd call you if we were.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: nPower Worcester: Oak House
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "nPower Worcester: Oak House"
Collapse
-
It should have been... but my command of good English is not up to your standard so it wouldn't have looked quite as polished as that response.Originally posted by eek View Postso surely you answer should have been.
Yes, someone clearly has. I, however, have not so cannot help.
That's true for me as well, I don't work in County Bumpkinville.
Leave a comment:
-
so surely you answer should have been.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostLOL good point. I did think about putting 'yes someone has' but thought that would be unhelpful to the OP
Yes, someone clearly has. I, however, have not so cannot help.
That's true for me as well, I don't work in County Bumpkinville.
Leave a comment:
-
LOL good point. I did think about putting 'yes someone has' but thought that would be unhelpful to the OPOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostNo it isn't. It isn't 1% factually correct. The question was whether anyone has worked at the site, and you answered "Nope". That isn't correct. The fact that you haven't worked there doesn't mean that no-one has.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostHas anyone worked at this client site before?Originally posted by northernladuk View PostNope. HTH
No it isn't. It isn't 1% factually correct. The question was whether anyone has worked at the site, and you answered "Nope". That isn't correct. The fact that you haven't worked there doesn't mean that no-one has.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI can honestly say, unlike the content of many of my previous 12.5k posts, that my statement is factually 100% correct and did not have to resort to pasting random stuff of Google.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
I can honestly say, unlike the content of many of my previous 12.5k posts, that my statement is factually 100% correct and did not have to resort to pasting random stuff of Google.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostValue add as ever NL!
Leave a comment:
-
-
nPower Worcester: Oak House
Has anyone worked at this client site before?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: