Thanks for those responses.
I won't abuse you as we're not in General, but, you know what I'd call you if we were.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: nPower Worcester: Oak House
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "nPower Worcester: Oak House"
Collapse
-
It should have been... but my command of good English is not up to your standard so it wouldn't have looked quite as polished as that response.Originally posted by eek View Postso surely you answer should have been.
Yes, someone clearly has. I, however, have not so cannot help.
That's true for me as well, I don't work in County Bumpkinville.
Leave a comment:
-
so surely you answer should have been.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostLOL good point. I did think about putting 'yes someone has' but thought that would be unhelpful to the OP
Yes, someone clearly has. I, however, have not so cannot help.
That's true for me as well, I don't work in County Bumpkinville.
Leave a comment:
-
LOL good point. I did think about putting 'yes someone has' but thought that would be unhelpful to the OPOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostNo it isn't. It isn't 1% factually correct. The question was whether anyone has worked at the site, and you answered "Nope". That isn't correct. The fact that you haven't worked there doesn't mean that no-one has.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostHas anyone worked at this client site before?Originally posted by northernladuk View PostNope. HTH
No it isn't. It isn't 1% factually correct. The question was whether anyone has worked at the site, and you answered "Nope". That isn't correct. The fact that you haven't worked there doesn't mean that no-one has.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI can honestly say, unlike the content of many of my previous 12.5k posts, that my statement is factually 100% correct and did not have to resort to pasting random stuff of Google.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
I can honestly say, unlike the content of many of my previous 12.5k posts, that my statement is factually 100% correct and did not have to resort to pasting random stuff of Google.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostValue add as ever NL!
Leave a comment:
-
-
nPower Worcester: Oak House
Has anyone worked at this client site before?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Leave a comment: