Originally posted by SimonMac
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Direct v Agency
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Direct v Agency"
Collapse
-
-
I've only contracted direct once (as opposed to fixed-price jobs, where the money came up front). It was a complete pain in the arse. I'd worked with the organisation concerned (a large public utility firm) twice previously, each time through an agency. When they came calling a third time, and I knew the guys involved because I'd worked with them before, it seemed like a no-brainer just to go direct (the agency had since gone out of the picture for various reasons).
I've never had so many problems getting paid in my life. The guys I was working with were fine to deal with on a personal level, and just as happy with my work as they had been before, but to their accounts staff at head office any invoice from my ContractorCo was just another bill that they delayed paying until they couldn't possibly get away with holding out any more. In the end, I had to threaten to stop the project mid-flow in order to get the back payments I was owed (which amounted to about four months work at that point), and it soured the relationship. I'd never work on a pay-for-play, billable hours basis direct with any client ever again. Dealing with agents has its problems, but getting paid in a timely manner has never been one of them in my experience.
Leave a comment:
-
I've been direct more than once and the worse payers where both a very large well-known company and a small company. Oddly the medium sized companies were better at paying on time.
In terms of contract clauses the companies who were use to using contractors/other businesses had the better contracts and size played no part.
The only thing I would suggest is read the contract very carefully and use a lawyer who specialises in the particular area you deal in not just b2b contracts if you need some clauses redrafted.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI have always gone through an agency until this gig where I am direct, and touch wood have never had a problem either way but reading the threads about unsigned time sheets etc has gotten me thinking about what would happen if the worse came to pass.
When through an agency there is a reasonable level of protection that if you have a signed time sheet and are opted in (I think I got this the right way round but correct me if wrong) they must pay you. I assume the protection offered when direct is no more than any other B2B contract?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickNick View PostI've only been direct the once in the last ten years and it was the most pleasurable billing experience I've ever had. Never late, alwys well communicated. Just a shame that the client (a charity) was such an awkward place to work in terms of location. Not far enough to overnight but just a bit too far for a daily commute.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostIt was more a hypothetical what if, I am direct now, today was my first "pay day" so got me thinking what if. Major down side with direct is longer payment terms
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostIt was more a hypothetical what if, I am direct now, today was my first "pay day" so got me thinking what if. Major down side with direct is longer payment terms
They were a big company who paid on a one month in arrears basis. Fortunately I never had any problems with them.
But, as you say, it's always a risk. And many on here have had to accept 60/90/120 day payment terms on direct contracts.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAgain this is true but again I would guess even though it is longer you will have less hassle in the long run.
SimonMac LTD must have couple of 100K float so can swallow the first payment timeLast edited by SimonMac; 31 May 2012, 10:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostIt was more a hypothetical what if, I am direct now, today was my first "pay day" so got me thinking what if. Major down side with direct is longer payment terms
SimonMac LTD must have couple of 100K float so can swallow the first payment time
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThe downside is agents can be arses. What they should pay you and what they do as you have seen on the boards can be a whole different affair and despite this level of protection you can end up fighting tooth and nail for it.
As long as the client is a reasonably sized outfit I would hazard a guess you would have less payment problems in the long run. Couple of late payments maybe but not the hassle that an agent and introduce. It would be good if someone with long term direct to clients contracts can confirm.
Leave a comment:
-
The downside is agents can be arses. What they should pay you and what they do as you have seen on the boards can be a whole different affair and despite this level of protection you can end up fighting tooth and nail for it.
As long as the client is a reasonably sized outfit I would hazard a guess you would have less payment problems in the long run. Couple of late payments maybe but not the hassle that an agent and introduce. It would be good if someone with long term direct to clients contracts can confirm.
Leave a comment:
-
Direct v Agency
I have always gone through an agency until this gig where I am direct, and touch wood have never had a problem either way but reading the threads about unsigned time sheets etc has gotten me thinking about what would happen if the worse came to pass.
When through an agency there is a reasonable level of protection that if you have a signed time sheet and are opted in (I think I got this the right way round but correct me if wrong) they must pay you. I assume the protection offered when direct is no more than any other B2B contract?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: