Originally posted by Wanderer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Charity Sector
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Charity Sector"
Collapse
-
Yes it is. Mute mode started today and had a good day. The poll was very useful too.
-
My experience of charities is that they are a big hard nosed business, just like everyone else. I learned that one the hard way though it took me years rather than months. It's all just business to me now.Originally posted by oscarose View PostI voiced my opinions to others in the business as I refuse to be muted as always do my best for the client. On one hand the naivety of the new IT manager is quite funny but not so funny the 3rd party is seemingly lining their pockets at the expense of a charity.
As for them not listening to you, it's quite likely that they ARE listening but they know something that you don't or they have their own agenda. It sounds like you have made your point clearly and concisely, now it's time to shut up and keep your head down. Yeah, it's soul destroying. You just have to sit back and think of the money...
Leave a comment:
-
The bench is a great place to hold lofty principals.Originally posted by oscarose View PostThat's what permies do.
I'm a freelance contractor. I support myself, not an IT manager green behind the ears paying lip service to the rogue 3rd party.
Leave a comment:
-
FWIW, I think you've made the right decison. Sometimes you just have to say 'eff it, it just aint worth the grief'
Leave a comment:
-
I will go with the flow and the 60% poll result. Will avoid the 3rd party supplier and carry on smiling and invoicing. The stress of taking on the 3rd party isn't worth it and I've already made my point.
Just winds me up all the sales spiel.
Thank you very much for your advise.
Regards, Oscar.
Leave a comment:
-
That's what permies do.Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Postthen agree and support the final decision, no matter how stupid it might be.
I'm a freelance contractor. I support myself, not an IT manager green behind the ears paying lip service to the rogue 3rd party.
Leave a comment:
-
Do as we all have to do from time to time: Argue your case to the best of your talents then agree and support the final decision, no matter how stupid it might be.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=SteelyDan;1471270]Totally off the mark. I do have a few ideas how to improve the current application but haven't voiced them in public as not my remit.Originally posted by cojak View PostI would be very careful in this situation if I were you because you could go from hero to zero very quickly indeed.
QUOTE]
you are trying to feather your own nest in trying to derail the COTS option from the 3rd party?
.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=SteelyDan;1471270]Thanks for your input SD. However, I am not on a crusade. I am against 3rd party 'consultancies' bleeding the client dry via underhand tactics. If I'm burnt tomorrow it's no problem as I'll just move onto the next contract. In the meantime I'll cause havoc for the supplier 'Head of IT'.Originally posted by cojak View PostI would be very careful in this situation if I were you because you could go from hero to zero very quickly indeed.
QUOTE]
Agree with this ^.
Reading this through, it seems you are on a personal crusade against a sneaky 3rd party.
Although you may have the best of intentions (in protecting the client), I think you need to re-focus on what you are actually there to do. As a contractor, treading on toes is probably not within your remit, but you seem perilously close to doing that & getting your fingers burned.
There's a time when it's safe to butt in, and a time to butt out. Recognising this is key.Last edited by oscarose; 29 January 2012, 18:48.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=cojak;1471232]
I would be very careful in this situation if I were you because you could go from hero to zero very quickly indeed.
QUOTE]
Agree with this ^.
Reading this through, it seems you are on a personal crusade against a sneaky 3rd party.
Although you may have the best of intentions (in protecting the client), I think you need to re-focus on what you are actually there to do. As a contractor, treading on toes is probably not within your remit, but you seem perilously close to doing that & getting your fingers burned.
There's a time when it's safe to butt in, and a time to butt out. Recognising this is key.
Do you think the reason for you being sent to Cov is because someone suspects you are trying to feather your own nest in trying to derail the COTS option from the 3rd party? Just a thought.
Sounds like there's a whole lot of politics going on here. Tread carefully.Last edited by SteelyDan; 29 January 2012, 18:40.
Leave a comment:
-
The poll suggests you are correct Cojak and I totally respect your opinion.Originally posted by cojak View PostWell good luck!
But quite frankly, I've delivered improvements to the business which I know are appreciated by the ops team, hence the reference.
I realise I'm a contractor and shouldn't get involved in other matters. However, my issue is with the other 3rd party not the client.
I will go about exposing the other 3rd party in a very calculated matter.Last edited by oscarose; 29 January 2012, 20:34.
Leave a comment:
-
It's fine Cojak, I've already secured a reference from the head of operations so worse case is I'm burnt (with an excellent reference). Over the weekend I've started to think the best way forward is to take on the other 3rd party as nothing to lose. I've saved all emails to my personal account already showing my commitment to the work I was contracted to do.Originally posted by cojak View PostHi oscarose,
I would be very careful in this situation if I were you because you could go from hero to zero very quickly indeed.
Your contract and allegiance is with the client specified on said contract. You may be in big trouble if you do some in breach of that contract.
I would keep a log and document everything, keeping all emails to show that you are working in good faith.
Then get the hell out of there.
Thanks for the advise anyway and you are probably right but I can't let blaggers and cowboy suppliers manipulate people to such a degree.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Leave a comment: