I do however, want my client to have a clear understanding of the relationship between us; I'm an IT consultant employed by another company, providing expert services to them for the duration of project. The problem is that most managers do not see you as a legal entity, they see you as a temporary resource and rarely have the time or the inclination to study the specifics of the relationship. It's obviously in a contractor's interest to keep up to date with legislation etc, but rarely comes in to play in a real life scenario. I have made it clear to my current client that I am there to provide services, and there are regular discussions / meetings where I provide solutions for various aspects of the project; there's no real confusion as to my expertise, there are just a few points that are obviously misunderstood.
And yes, I'm going through an agency with this one... though I rarely trust agents to deliver the specifics in detail - they often sugar coat things (to both the consultant and the client) to obtain / keep business. I've met a few who understand the difference, but not many I'm afraid to say

To be honest, I may be over analysing things as I always do. There's no real problem, and I'm as flexible as I can be (I'm working the bank holiday and a few weekends, even though I'm not behind. Basically, the project has been very badly managed and massively underestimated), but when a client (or an agent in some past instances!) have stated false facts, it gets my back up!
Leave a comment: