Originally posted by SimonMac
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		All very professional.
On another note, le tour is a little boring today so I'll play along a little, it really does make me smile when people get so serious about being polite and professional in response to my original post.
I can only assume that 1, professional agent or whoever, considers a mail response to a job application saying if you havent heard in 7 days, tough, is professional. Actually the mail said you've been unsuccessful if not heard in 7 days but you get the drift.
2, I'd have thought the comment Norfolking chance aluded to the rather tongue in cheek response but perhaps some people are so professional they've lost a sense of humour?
3, I dont see anything wrong in telling an agent who is fobbing you off or not (my opinion) that they have a shorter exclusivity period than they are telling you.
48 hours is plenty of time for an agent to know who they are going to submit. How many roles are still going to be available 7 days later? You'll be very fortunate to find an agent at this time who would submit or consider submitting you for the role.
If agents want to present me for a role, I need to know whether they have and Im not stuck in their reject list or worse, found I've spoken to some chimp and the account manager is the one who'll decide whether toput you forward or not.
If some people are happy to wait 7 days to find out they havent been submitted (and the way they find out is because they have heard nothing) that's up to them.
Being selective for the roles I want I impose an exclusivity period of 48 hours. If the agent gets back to me and says this is how its progressing or nope, you didnt make the cut, that's fine with me. I can them explore other avenues and not miss these opportunities.



 
				 
				 
				 
				
Leave a comment: