Hi
A related question, my agency are refusing to put any payment schedule details into the contract, they do offer a weekly run but won't put any details about it in the contract.
Is this unusual? At the moment I'm not signing until payment details are added.
Thanks
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Agency changing from weekly to monthly payments - HELP!"
Collapse
-
WHS - run like the wind.Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostRun away, run away!
Agency is going bust - why else would they need to break the contract in this way? Contractor can terminate immediately as it's a breach of warranty in the contract.
Start chasing for late payment, and limit the credit. Talk to the client about any concerns you may have.
Leave a comment:
-
Run away, run away!Originally posted by lexington_spurs View PostI know someone in this situation ..
Agency has tried to switch to monthly payment without notice.
The agency and management team behind it have been through insolvency/liquidation before.
Leave a comment:
-
I know someone in this situation ..
Agency has tried to switch to monthly payment without notice.
A face to face meeting with the "CEO" of the agency has led to a compromise agreement .. whereby a transition period was agreed, during which invoices would still be raised and paid bi-weekly. This was confirmed later by email.
Agency has not met the first deadline during this transition period - should the LTD companies involved insist on setting a credit limit to restrict their exposure?
Any precedents/war stories? The agency and management team behind it have been through insolvency/liquidation before. Ideally the LTD companies would want to provide services through a different member of the end client PSL, but this may be difficult to achieve due to the restrictions in the current contract.
Leave a comment:
-
There are two different points of change being discussed in different threads - either (a) agency is try to change mid-contract or (b) I want weekly, agency wants monthly, but I haven't started yet (which is how I read Mephisto's post in this thread).Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThe question I am interested in is how many people are just voicing their annoyance to change and would be easier for them just to put up with it and who really cannot accept these terms and are willing to go down this route?
Will this strategy not back fire on some people, they say fair enough and let you walk? Must be good opportunity for agents to strip some dead wood and fill with cheaper/better people? Risky strategy or does it neve fail?
(a) - if the agency is trying to change payment terms mid-contract (and is forcing it through), then WORRY. The agency can't pay it's bills. I would refuse, flag it to someone at the client, and start looking. I would not be extending my exposure any further.
If the agency can manage the client well enough to run the risk of losing contractors and replacing them easily, then they might well pursue this strategy. But it's a risky one for the agency to take.
(b) - depends on their credit rating. I'm not that fussed, to be honest, as long as I think that I will get paid.
Leave a comment:
-
The question I am interested in is how many people are just voicing their annoyance to change and would be easier for them just to put up with it and who really cannot accept these terms and are willing to go down this route?but you could walk away if the payment terms are not what you want.
Will this strategy not back fire on some people, they say fair enough and let you walk? Must be good opportunity for agents to strip some dead wood and fill with cheaper/better people? Risky strategy or does it neve fail?
Leave a comment:
-
Also, FWIW, an agency will ALWAYS try to pay you on the longest possible terms. That's the nature of managing your cashflow.Originally posted by Mephisto View PostI've heard tell that even if an Agency try to impose monthly on you, that you can stil insist on weekly. Is this true? nalE currently won't budge on this even though I KNOW they have a weekly payroll!!
Clients want to pay on the longest terms. Suppliers want to get paid on the shortest terms. The key to a successful business is managing this.
Leave a comment:
-
You have a contract with the agency. That contract will detail what the payment terms are. Negotiate with the agency before you sign the contract - you can't insist on payment terms, but you could walk away if the payment terms are not what you want.Originally posted by Mephisto View PostI've heard tell that even if an Agency try to impose monthly on you, that you can stil insist on weekly. Is this true? nalE currently won't budge on this even though I KNOW they have a weekly payroll!!
It's a contract negotiation, so negotiate.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course you can. One agent tried this with me, said it was now pollicy yadda yadda, and I said I'd leave. The following week when they didn't budge, I handed in my notice to them and informed the client. 2 hours later, sorted.Originally posted by Mephisto View PostI've heard tell that even if an Agency try to impose monthly on you, that you can stil insist on weekly. Is this true? nalE currently won't budge on this even though I KNOW they have a weekly payroll!!
Leave a comment:
-
I've heard tell that even if an Agency try to impose monthly on you, that you can stil insist on weekly. Is this true? nalE currently won't budge on this even though I KNOW they have a weekly payroll!!
Leave a comment:
-
Agency changing from weekly to monthly payments - HELP!
<placeholder for now>Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08


Leave a comment: