• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: How Progressive...

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How Progressive..."

Collapse

  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Bumfluff View Post
    £5mil they are either,

    1. Telling porky pies.
    2. Made a mistake and added an extra 0
    3. Telling the truth but making it sound much more grand, the £5mil I suppose could include ongoing support, hardware, liciensing costs.
    I don't know anything about buying a commercial database, but it always amazes me just how much such a project is stated to have cost.

    5 mil seems at the low end, so I can believe that they could spend this much.

    And I see no reason why hardware and licensing costs shouldn't be included in the spend, ISTM that this is actually going to be a significant amount of the total.

    What do Oracle etc charge for such a licence? 500 grand, a million perhaps?

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • El_Diablo
    replied
    You must've felt very proud of yourself.
    I did apologise. I lost it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by El_Diablo View Post
    Yes they are Regressive indeed, I nearly made a female consultant cry there once, foolish thing she was.
    You must've felt very proud of yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • El_Diablo
    replied
    Yes they are Regressive indeed, I nearly made a female consultant cry there once, foolish thing she was.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Wilmslow View Post
    I have just reviewed 3 CV's sent through from Progressive.

    All I can say is, words fail me.
    A while back, HR at one company insisted on using Progressive. "The CVs look really good". So, we invited candidates to interview. They didn't turn up.

    HR insisted after that on NOT using Progressive. At least one of those candidates, we found out later, was not aware his CV was put forward, and wasn't available.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hemingfield
    replied
    So (alledgedly) this one agency of job pimps have reaped in enough profits off of our hard work to hand a cool five mil over to a 'Yellow Pages' database?

    I'd love to know who sold it to them - I bet they had ties with the CSA computer overhaul! If it was it is probably one poor manager getting a thousand unrelated CVs landing in his 'In' tray every morning.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by dude69 View Post
    OMG:


    "We have just invested 5 million pounds in a market leading database, which allows us to mailshot your CV to over 1000 managers each day. "

    I would be quite annoyed if an agency sent my CV to 1000 people every day.
    Not for nothing are they known as Aggressive.

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    So which of you MS-Access contractors has been building a database for Progressive?

    They would have done better by offering a bounty on permie managers names and contact details - say a tenner each?

    Leave a comment:


  • XperTest
    replied
    Originally posted by Bumfluff View Post
    £5mil they are either,

    1. Telling porky pies.
    2. Made a mistake and added an extra 0
    3. Telling the truth but making it sound much more grand, the £5mil I suppose could include ongoing support, hardware, liciensing costs.

    All 3 things agents are very good at
    I/you wish..

    Leave a comment:


  • Bumfluff
    replied
    £5mil they are either,

    1. Telling porky pies.
    2. Made a mistake and added an extra 0
    3. Telling the truth but making it sound much more grand, the £5mil I suppose could include ongoing support, hardware, liciensing costs.

    All 3 things agents are very good at

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Wilmslow View Post
    I have just reviewed 3 CV's sent through from Progressive.

    All I can say is, words fail me.

    Obviously...

    Leave a comment:


  • Wilmslow
    replied
    I have just reviewed 3 CV's sent through from Progressive.

    All I can say is, words fail me.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    This is hilarious. They should be called Degenerative rather than Progressive. Or maybe Progressive Disorder.

    Leave a comment:


  • dude69
    replied
    OMG:


    "We have just invested 5 million pounds in a market leading database, which allows us to mailshot your CV to over 1000 managers each day. "

    I would be quite annoyed if an agency sent my CV to 1000 people every day.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    We missed an opportunity there!

    I'd have done it for £4.5 million for them.
    We'd have done it for 2.25 million each.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X