• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "An unwanted day off...."

Collapse

  • weemster
    replied
    word.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bluebird
    replied
    no I want the last word....

    Word.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    I have never seen the word 'sez' being substituted for 'says' in any well written article penned by a professional writer or journalist.

    A dictionary may well include colloquialisms, but that doesn't mean that using them means that a piece is well written.
    Quite right. And if I was writing one of my pieces for a magazine, I wouldn't use it. But colloquialism and idiom are as appropriate for online forums as smileys. Which also wouldn't be used by professional writers or journalists in a well-written article.

    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    I hope your computer code and your grasp of the latest techie geeky IT gobbledegook is a lot more up to date than your knowledge of English.
    Nah. Never could get the hang of geek-speak.

    You can have the last word now, if you like.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    Wrong. It shows direction and control. Not a good Ir35 pointer. Depending on how the client phrases your 'day off' (which is a very permie term anway). If the client told you that there's no work for you to do, then fine. If they said, they aren't willing to pay even if there is work and it is used as a way of getting you to conform to normal working and vacation patterns so you can't be an exception that's not so good.

    No freelancer is told when they can and can't work, when the work is there.
    I don't agree with you on this, but I guess it's a matter of interpretation - one man's D&C is another man's lack of MOO.

    ESM1071 - Detailed guide to determining status: mutuality of obligation states that "There must be an irreducible minimum of mutual obligation for there to be a contract of service [ie. inside IR35]. That irreducible minimum is
    • that the engager must be obliged to pay a wage or other remuneration, and
      that the worker must be obliged to provide his or her own work or skill.


    Although it does state that this alone doesn't make you inside IR35, which is why I said that a lack of this is a pointer.

    Note that is doesn't add "if there's work for you to do"

    (Also I tell them when I am unavailable to them, I don't ask their permission)

    More information on HMRC IR35 interview notes can be found here

    And here's general guidance advice.

    With the information here guys, you can make up your own minds rather than watching us bicker with Denny

    There's nothing to beat the horse's mouth, eh?

    (NB. contract of service = inside Ir35; contract of services = outside IR35)

    HTH
    Last edited by cojak; 7 December 2007, 08:12.

    Leave a comment:


  • Denny
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    You mean I had to change my signature to spell it out before you realised? And you call me stupid!

    "As any fule kno'" and "sez you" were around long before text speak.

    Funnily enough, it turns out that I DO have a dictionary on my bookshelf - the shorter OED in two volumes. And "sez" is to be found in there. Verb transitive and intransitive, a colloquialism from the mid 19th century. For further instruction, the reader is invited to see the entry under "says", and "says you", much as I defined it, is also there.

    My knowledge of English is better than yours. Yah-boo sucks.
    Who takes any notice of 19th century chavs - eh!

    I have never seen the word 'sez' being substituted for 'says' in any well written article penned by a professional writer or journalist.

    A dictionary may well include colloquialisms, but that doesn't mean that using them means that a piece is well written.

    I hope your computer code and your grasp of the latest techie geeky IT gobbledegook is a lot more up to date than your knowledge of English.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    You mean I had to change my signature to spell it out before you realised? And you call me stupid!

    "As any fule kno'" and "sez you" were around long before text speak.

    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    One thing I also know 'isn't there' on your bookshelf is a dictionary. SEZ : laugh: laugh
    Funnily enough, it turns out that I DO have a dictionary on my bookshelf - the shorter OED in two volumes. And "sez" is to be found in there. Verb transitive and intransitive, a colloquialism from the mid 19th century. For further instruction, the reader is invited to see the entry under "says", and "says you", much as I defined it, is also there.

    My knowledge of English is better than yours. Yah-boo sucks.
    Last edited by NotAllThere; 6 December 2007, 19:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • Denny
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I'm glad you're keeping your sense of humour.



    That's ripe coming from someone who has never ... seen me in the flesh or seen evidence of educational background.

    For all you know I could look like and be as rich as Elle McPhearson but with a double first from Oxford.

    Tell me, are you a ghost?



    As any fule kno', "sez you" is an ungrammatical, incorrectly spelled inversion of "you say". It is a slang idiom, meaning "Just because you say that, doesn't make it true." Have you never been in a playground? Or overheard an early teen/chav attempt at rational debate?

    I'm also quite intrigued. Do think I wasn't aware of the connotations of my handle when I chose it?
    As any fule kno', "sez you" is an ungrammatical, incorrectly spelled inversion of "you say". It is a slang idiom, meaning "Just because you say that, doesn't make it true." Have you never been in a playground? Or overheard an early teen/chav attempt at rational debate?

    No. I don't mix in those circles. Clearly u du az u appeer to b such an xpert on the subject.

    I'm also quite intrigued. Do think I wasn't aware of the connotations of my handle when I chose it.

    No, that's why you have a signature that clearly demonstrates that you are aware of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I'm glad you're keeping your sense of humour.

    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    A very stupid one as well.
    That's ripe coming from someone who has never ... seen me in the flesh or seen evidence of educational background.

    For all you know I could look like and be as rich as Elle McPhearson but with a double first from Oxford.

    Tell me, are you a ghost?

    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    One thing I do know : if you are smarter, richer, better looking than me you certainly aren't a better speller than me.

    Not all there is a good name for you NAT. One thing I also know 'isn't there' on your bookshelf is a dictionary. SEZ : laugh: laugh
    As any fule kno', "sez you" is an ungrammatical, incorrectly spelled inversion of "you say". It is a slang idiom, meaning "Just because you say that, doesn't make it true." Have you never been in a playground? Or overheard an early teen/chav attempt at rational debate?

    I'm also quite intrigued. Do think I wasn't aware of the connotations of my handle when I chose it?
    Last edited by NotAllThere; 6 December 2007, 15:44.

    Leave a comment:


  • Denny
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Sez you.

    Ah, you're just jealous cos I'm smarter, better looking and richer than you.
    Sez you?????

    That's ripe coming from someone who has never seen my bank statements, assets, nor seen me in the flesh or seen evidence of educational background.

    For all you know I could look like and be as rich as Elle McPhearson but with a double first from Oxford.

    Tell me, are you a ghost?

    One thing I do know : if you are smarter, richer, better looking than me you certainly aren't a better speller than me.

    Not all there is a good name for you NAT. One thing I also know 'isn't there' on your bookshelf is a dictionary. SEZ : laugh: laugh

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny View Post
    A very stupid one as well.

    Argument ends here.
    Sez you.

    Ah, you're just jealous cos I'm smarter, better looking and richer than you.
    Last edited by NotAllThere; 6 December 2007, 12:22.

    Leave a comment:


  • Denny
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    But where will it end?
    It ends where it started to end - with me a few posts ago.

    The next few 'ends' weren't ends at all, but 'start ups'

    Leave a comment:


  • shelby68
    replied
    Originally posted by Gonzo View Post

    This is actually quite a good thing. It was going to be a disaster and I was keen to put some distance between it and myself, but I was staying on out of a sense of obligation to the department head, who had worked hard to keep me on it depsite the project sponsor thinking that I was too expensive.
    Don't most project sponsor think that about all contractors

    Mine did until they saw what my manager was charging for his 1/2 day a week admin...

    Leave a comment:


  • Gonzo
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    But where will it end?
    Don't start, you know where this road leads.

    Back on topic, think yourself lucky. I have just found out that the project I was going to be working on for the first half of next year has been canned.

    This is actually quite a good thing. It was going to be a disaster and I was keen to put some distance between it and myself, but I was staying on out of a sense of obligation to the department head, who had worked hard to keep me on it depsite the project sponsor thinking that I was too expensive.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    But where will it end?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wilmslow
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    No, it ends here.
    I started this thread, so I insist on ending it.

    So there.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X