- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Opt in / Opt out - whats it all about?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Opt in / Opt out - whats it all about?"
Collapse
-
Also you can opt in at any point by writing a nice letter to your agent. Most of them are clueless feckers though and don't understand the very clear wording either/or.
The upside is that you can just let them believe what they want to believe but if it ever goes to court You show them an interview date of say 1st December and an opt-out signed 10th December and the court laughs themself silly at the stupid agency because it is blatantly obvious that you are opted in.
If you are opted in, you are opted in. You can't change that no matter what you sign or what you agree with the agent. The only way they could prove that you're not opted in is if they forge the paperwork and backdate the opt out paperwork hich of course would be fraud which is totally illegal....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mailric View Posthow would they prove you didn;t opt out until after you met the client?
if you verbally opt-out and then meet the client, but not actually opt out in writing then whats the score?
Leave a comment:
-
how would they prove you didn;t opt out until after you met the client?
if you verbally opt-out and then meet the client, but not actually opt out in writing then whats the score?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostCourse they would.
It's to the agency's financial advantage to argue the introduction takes place when you physically meet the client. Industry custom and practise could be argued to show otherwise.
in·tro·duc·tion (ĭn'trə-dŭk'shən)
n.- The act or process of introducing or the state of being introduced.
- A means, such as a personal letter, of presenting one person to another.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThere is always the question of whether a phone interview counts as meeting the client...
I would argue yes it does, but agencies will argue that it doesn't.
It's to the agency's financial advantage to argue the introduction takes place when you physically meet the client. Industry custom and practise could be argued to show otherwise.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostBecause the ability to opt out ceases as soon as you meet the end client. And unless you can work out how to have an interview without meeting the end client....
That's why we went for the opt-out option in the first place. The whole thrust of the regs is to protect Sally from Office Angels getting shafted by her client and her agency, who until the regs could have withheld her £10 an hour for all sorts of reasons for several months, forced her to work excessive hours and stopped her working for anyone else for months at a time even if it put her out of work. That those conditions can help us in some circumstances is purely coincidental.
The PCG guidance is also entirely clear, as long as you accept the DTI's own position that the opt out takes you out of all of the regs in their entirety, a point which is not immediately obvious from the regs themselves (Whch are a masterpiece of carp drafting).
I would argue yes it does, but agencies will argue that it doesn't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ashwin2007 View PostThe interview is never mentioned in any of the contract document. So nobody may know if the interview has ever taken place. Then why is the interview considered so important for opt-out considerations?
That's why we went for the opt-out option in the first place. The whole thrust of the regs is to protect Sally from Office Angels getting shafted by her client and her agency, who until the regs could have withheld her £10 an hour for all sorts of reasons for several months, forced her to work excessive hours and stopped her working for anyone else for months at a time even if it put her out of work. That those conditions can help us in some circumstances is purely coincidental.
The PCG guidance is also entirely clear, as long as you accept the DTI's own position that the opt out takes you out of all of the regs in their entirety, a point which is not immediately obvious from the regs themselves (Whch are a masterpiece of crap drafting).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by johhnysalad View PostHowever, as has been suggested here, by the time you interview, if you've not opt-ed out you have by default opted-in.
Clear as mud.....
Leave a comment:
-
clear as mud. i'm going to head to PCG as advised.
i've understood everything up to now, but this does jusn't (yet) make any sense!
i didn't think i was that stupid until now
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe act says "either introduced to the client or has started work" or something like that. The implication being that an interview / meeting is an introduction, otherwise there would be no need to have the "either / or" part of the wording.
The opt-out for which PCG lobbied is covered in paragraph (9) of Clause 32 and reads as follows:
“(9) Subject to paragraph (12), paragraphs (1) - (8) shall not apply where a work-seeker which is a company, and the person who is or would be supplied by that work-seeker to carry out the work, agree that they should not apply, and give notice of that agreement to an employment business or agency, provided that such notice is given before the introduction or supply of the work-seeker or the person who would be supplied by the work-seeker to do the work, to the hirer.”
No mention of "either" there . It also goes on to say;
... it is a contravention of the Act for any agency to require you to opt out of the Agency Regulations. It may also be illegal for them to pressure you to do so by threatening not to put forward your CV.
.... the “opt out” must take place before you are introduced to the client. In most cases, therefore, this means that it must take the form of a letter from you to the agency. It cannot form part of the contract, as you will already have been introduced to the client before you sign any contracts.
Clear as mud.....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe act says "either introduced to the client or has started work" or something like that. The implication being that an interview / meeting is an introduction, otherwise there would be no need to have the "either / or" part of the wording.
CP have argued with me before that you can opt out up until you start work, as it says "OR" but they don't understand the word "EITHER" beforehand.
General interpretation is your first offical contact with the client, which for most of us is the interview stage. Once you're past that, you can't opt out. That's why you send an opt out letter with your original application.
Incidentally never ever believe any interpretation provided by CP. They don't even understand VAT accounting.Last edited by malvolio; 24 October 2007, 21:47.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIf you are going through an umbrella, and you've already got the gig, then there is no advantage to you of opting out.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by barry_abs View Posti already met the client (interview), so by default i'm opted-in.. so why are the agency and umbrella encouraging me to opt-out?
this is the least clear of all the terms i've had to agree/state..
i'm not a Ltd. (anymore), i am under IR35, i just want my money and not to be handcuffed.. should i opt-in?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostThere is still some debate as to the interpretation of "introduced"
Is it.
Miss B was introduced to Miss A (sorry moose). Which implies meeting for the first time.
Or is it
Substance A was introduced into the mixture. Which implies actualy being placed at the clients site.
**This may have been resolved.
I am not qualified to give this advice.
CP have argued with me before that you can opt out up until you start work, as it says "OR" but they don't understand the word "EITHER" beforehand.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: