• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I have been away from the game for a while. Is QDOS still worth it?"

Collapse

  • PerfectStorm
    replied
    Originally posted by pr1 View Post

    That's a very useful summary of a company the OP wasn't asking about
    Oops - you're right.

    I wouldn't get QDOS insurance (has never paid out, IPSE cover provides the same day to day benefit and is better in some ways, IMO)

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by PerfectStorm View Post
    I've had it, and used it for 3 things

    1) I and my company were investigated to check that everything was above board. It was, I'd done nothing wrong, but it still took about 9 months and IPSE's lawyers were able to answer all questions as well as have the confidence to tell HMRC "You can't ask that" on a few occasions. I was glad to have it
    2) When a couple clients wanted to move from Outside to in, they helped suggest contractual changes to make them still retain some useful 'outside' features, as well as suggest ways of limiting impact on prior work
    3) I buy my shopping and hotel bookings with their vouchers which helps offset the price. It's the only way I know of getting money off Airbnb, for instance.

    The cost per year ends up being a small fraction of a day rate when all of the above are taken into account.
    seeing as we're going waaaay off topic.
    I cancelled IPSE and use federation of small businesses. Get the same for half the price (except no voucher scheme).,

    Leave a comment:


  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by PerfectStorm View Post
    I've had it, and used it for 3 things

    1) I and my company were investigated to check that everything was above board. It was, I'd done nothing wrong, but it still took about 9 months and IPSE's lawyers were able to answer all questions as well as have the confidence to tell HMRC "You can't ask that" on a few occasions. I was glad to have it
    2) When a couple clients wanted to move from Outside to in, they helped suggest contractual changes to make them still retain some useful 'outside' features, as well as suggest ways of limiting impact on prior work
    3) I buy my shopping and hotel bookings with their vouchers which helps offset the price. It's the only way I know of getting money off Airbnb, for instance.

    The cost per year ends up being a small fraction of a day rate when all of the above are taken into account.
    That's a very useful summary of a company the OP wasn't asking about

    Leave a comment:


  • PerfectStorm
    replied
    Edit: was talking about IPSE and not QDOS
    Last edited by PerfectStorm; 17 January 2023, 16:32. Reason: Talking about the wrong company

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    If the client is in the Netherlands and doesn't have any UK based entities then IR35 doesn't really factor in anyway.
    Well, it’s under Chapter 8, the same as IR35 for the majority of its history, so YourCo is responsible and liable.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    If the client is in the Netherlands and doesn't have any UK based entities then IR35 doesn't really factor in anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    only worth having if you are working inside but paying tax as outside.
    That isn't going to work. Read the T&Cs, noting the requirement for a "reasonable prospect of success" at the outset. If there's a reasonable prospect of success, then you're almost certainly outside in reality too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    IR35 insurance
    only worth having if you are working inside but paying tax as outside.

    It's a small part of the industry where clients are <£1M; and there aren't enough contractors for HMRC to chase IMO.
    Anyway, for a small client, you should be able to actually be genuinely outside.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    IR35 insurance
    IR35 insurance was never worth it and remains not worth it for contracts that fall under Chapter 8. The chance of hitting that "sweet spot" where your contract is determined inside IR35 after exhausting all avenues of appeal and yet has a reasonable prospect of success at the start of that process (as required by the T&Cs for any payout) is next to zero.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    IR35 insurance

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    for what?
    They do various products. They sell insurance. If you need insurance then they may well be the supplier for you.
    What insurance product do you have in mind?

    Leave a comment:


  • I have been away from the game for a while. Is QDOS still worth it?

    When I was contracting a few years ago they were a no brainer but I know there have been a load of changes back and forth with the IR35 rules. Are QDOS still the major players or have things changed there?

    My client (if this goes ahead) will be in the Netherlands (weirdly, a different Netherlands based client to the one I posted about a few months ago), in case that makes a difference to anything.

Working...
X