Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Payment landing post-March
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Payment landing post-March"
Collapse
-
I cited both to evidence the change of wording following the HMRC review. The draft legislation emphasised that services before April 6 were within scope if payments were received afterwards - hence the panic - but this was clarified following the review and the outcome can be seen in the enacted legislation. Yes, the wording is still ambiguous in the enacted legislation, but this change was made following the HMRC review and they explicitly conceded this point in the review.Originally posted by SteelyDan View PostThat's the confusing part with statement 1...it's poorly worded & it depends how you read or interpret it. Is it the payment made on or after the 6th of April, or the services provided on or after 6th April?
Statement 2 (the previous statement) seemed to strictly confine it to payments made on or after the 6th April.
In other words, I really think the situation is quite clear, legally speaking, if not quite so clear to fee payers.
Here is the outcome of the review:
https://assets.publishing.service.go...w_Document.pdf
Here is the explicit concession, which may provide you with some comfort.
My emphasis. Following the delayed implementation, I think it's quite clear that the same approach will apply in 2021 as it did in 2020 (i.e., for all references to 2020 substitute 2021).4.7 A common issue raised over the course of the review has been businesses’
concerns over when the rules will begin to apply to payments. Businesses
were concerned that the existing legislation would catch contracts for
services provided before April 2020 but invoiced after the rules came into
effect. Businesses reported that this was having an immediate impact on
their decisions about contracts.
4.8 The Government has listened and taken action early to give businesses
certainty, announcing on 7 February 2020 that the rules will now apply only
to payments made for services provided on or after 6 April 2020.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThe fact that all the agents and clients pushed payments early speaks volumes so whatever the ambiguity you want paying before the 6th.
Indeed that was my thinking. I'm awaiting a response from my accountant to see what he says, & hopefully that will support the message I send to the paying consultancy.
Leave a comment:
-
The fact that all the agents and clients pushed payments early speaks volumes so whatever the ambiguity you want paying before the 6th.Originally posted by SteelyDan View PostThat's the confusing part with statement 1...it's poorly worded & it depends how you read or interpret it. Is it the payment made on or after the 6th of April, or the services provided on or after 6th April?
Statement 2 (the previous statement) seemed to strictly confine it to payments made on or after the 6th April.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostNo, I think there is clarity that it will apply to services provided on or after April 6 2021, not payments made on or after April 6 2021 (a broader net). That is my reading of the situation anyway - a slight concession to simplify matters, following consultation.
That's the confusing part with statement 1...it's poorly worded & it depends how you read or interpret it. Is it the payment made on or after the 6th of April, or the services provided on or after 6th April?
Statement 2 (the previous statement) seemed to strictly confine it to payments made on or after the 6th April.
Leave a comment:
-
No, I think there is clarity that it will apply to services provided on or after April 6 2021, not payments made on or after April 6 2021 (a broader net). That is my reading of the situation anyway - a slight concession to simplify matters, following consultation.Originally posted by SteelyDan View PostSo, that's a bit confusing.
According to one of the links (press) dated Feb 2020:
A) "HMRC has stated ahead of the publication of the government’s review that the changes being implemented in April 2020 will only apply to payments made for services provided on or after 6 April.",
whereas the contrasting, &
B) previous quote "Previously, the changes were due to be applied to any payments made on or after 6 April 2020"
So, at this stage, no clarity?
Leave a comment:
-
Still very odd. I'm on a PS role along with a few others and we are outside as we through a consultancy owning and delivering a service. There are also people here inside doing standard roles. We are on totally different frameworks and there isn't a crossover between them so they can't just switch us to inside.Originally posted by SteelyDan View PostYou talking about the end client here? I'm not in direct communication with them at the moment, & don't think I'm in a place to query their decision, if you mean the end client...but I take your point that pub sec have, in the main, been inside roles. Though not always, even roles at HMRC for example have been outside, AFAIA.
The structure is private sector consultancy>my co as associate to consultancy>end client (gov org). I'm assuming the end client has told them (consultancy) of their decision wef April.
Are the consultancy offering a service via Gcloud or are they just offering bums on seats via the Specialists route?
The only thing I can think of, and maybe I missed the point but, it must be the consultancy is dictating the IR35 status and has nothing to do with the gov client. That would explain the timings of the switch.
But yes you want you payment before April 4th or whatever date. Most agents and clients will do this. There was a raft of early payments when it hit the public sector and they left it so late last year people were getting paid before April last year as well.
Leave a comment:
-
So, that's a bit confusing.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostWhether the client actually operates it properly is another matter entirely
According to one of the links (press) dated Feb 2020:
A) "HMRC has stated ahead of the publication of the government’s review that the changes being implemented in April 2020 will only apply to payments made for services provided on or after 6 April.",
whereas the contrasting, &
B) previous quote "Previously, the changes were due to be applied to any payments made on or after 6 April 2020"
So, at this stage, no clarity?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostVery strange situation. The rules have been in place for public sector for two years now.
I'm confused and concerned they don't seem to understand the timings and how it affects them so I'd raise this with them and ask them why they are acting like a private sector setup when they are not.
You talking about the end client here? I'm not in direct communication with them at the moment, & don't think I'm in a place to query their decision, if you mean the end client...but I take your point that pub sec have, in the main, been inside roles. Though not always, even roles at HMRC for example have been outside, AFAIA.
The structure is private sector consultancy>my co as associate to consultancy>end client (gov org). I'm assuming the end client has told them (consultancy) of their decision wef April.
Leave a comment:
-
Very strange situation. The rules have been in place for public sector for two years now.Originally posted by SteelyDan View PostI mentioned this is another thread yesterday (about Banking) but didn't get any response so thought I'd start a separate thread on this particular point.
(Background is the outside role I start on Monday is a c.3-monther, and ends 31st of March, after which end client (gov dept) has said no more PSCs and it's inside wef April.)
I'm sure I've read on here that caution needs to be applied wrt final invoice payment, which will land in my business a/c (when I get one) end of April as it's 30 days payment terms, but can't find it.
Can someone advise if I've imagined it, or if there are possible issues? If so, I'll need to speak to the client so they can make this final payment quicker than the 30 days to avoid any issues.
Cheers.
I'm confused and concerned they don't seem to understand the timings and how it affects them so I'd raise this with them and ask them why they are acting like a private sector setup when they are not.
Leave a comment:
-
Whether the client actually operates it properly is another matter entirely
Leave a comment:
-
The draft legislation said this (or at least, one version of it):
https://assets.publishing.service.go...egislation.pdf
In contrast, it looks like the enacted legislation from FA 2020 says this:The amendments made by Part 2 of this Schedule have effect in relation to
deemed direct payments treated as made on or after 6 April 2020, and does
so even if relating to services provided before that date.
Finance Act 2020
There was also some stuff in the press around the time (prior to the delay):The amendments made by Part 2 of this Schedule have effect in relation to deemed direct payments treated as made on or after 6 April 2021.
HMRC make changes to reform off-payroll working rules
Leave a comment:
-
Payment landing post-March
I mentioned this is another thread yesterday (about Banking) but didn't get any response so thought I'd start a separate thread on this particular point.
(Background is the outside role I start on Monday is a c.3-monther, and ends 31st of March, after which end client (gov dept) has said no more PSCs and it's inside wef April.)
I'm sure I've read on here that caution needs to be applied wrt final invoice payment, which will land in my business a/c (when I get one) end of April as it's 30 days payment terms, but can't find it.
Can someone advise if I've imagined it, or if there are possible issues? If so, I'll need to speak to the client so they can make this final payment quicker than the 30 days to avoid any issues.
Cheers.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: