Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Epidemiologist role
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Epidemiologist role"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostI thought one is paid for the work done and not where is located?
Leave a comment:
-
It's how you write the contract - there are few rules how to make it "inside" to avoid employment law and remove the risk of HMRC investigation. The CEST is just to confirm you got it "right".Originally posted by LondonManc View PostTry reading what I said. The rate is a good rate for the location.
The IR35 status could have been assessed properly - you have no clue as to whether they've used the EST tool or not. No substitution for starters, I'd expect.
I thought one is paid for the work done and not where is located?
Leave a comment:
-
Try reading what I said. The rate is a good rate for the location.Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostWhat's good about that? They just participate in employment law avoidance. If they want employee, they should look for an employee.
The IR35 status could have been assessed properly - you have no clue as to whether they've used the EST tool or not. No substitution for starters, I'd expect.
Leave a comment:
-
What's good about that? They just participate in employment law avoidance. If they want employee, they should look for an employee.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostIt may be inside but they've reflected that in a very good rate for the location.
Leave a comment:
-
It may be inside but they've reflected that in a very good rate for the location.Originally posted by quackhandle View PostHelp us* in the fight against Covid-19.
Epidemiologist
*It's Inside IR35 so we're gonna shaft you on tax.
qh
Leave a comment:
-
Epidemiologist role
Help us* in the fight against Covid-19.
Epidemiologist
*It's Inside IR35 so we're gonna shaft you on tax.
qhTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Today 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Yesterday 00:23
- ‘Stable’ IT contractor demand moved near growth in February 2026 Mar 10 06:49
- What is a tax-efficient salary for 2026/27 as a limited company director? Mar 9 06:23
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Mar 6 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Mar 5 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59

Leave a comment: