Originally posted by LondonManc
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Agency asking me for Onboarding Information 9 months into Contract"
Collapse
-
Resubmit those and your original cv.Originally posted by ziggystardust View PostThey're a UK agency. I did all of what you did - initially provided references that were agency names and my Accountant's reference and they were fine with it... hence why I passed all checks and was offered a contract.
Mr Button, it's not self-obsession that I am displaying, just a genuine concern and determination to understand the logic behind their requests as this is the first I have ever had in all my 7 years of contracting. Fair to question, don't ya think.
Leave a comment:
-
They're a UK agency. I did all of what you did - initially provided references that were agency names and my Accountant's reference and they were fine with it... hence why I passed all checks and was offered a contract.Originally posted by BigDataPro View Post//It's the agency internal onboarding team ....
Its very likely that you are contracting with one of the Indian consultancies like Wipro, TCS, Cognizant and so on. Once they even asked where my father was born and what was his qualification...lol
//As for referee contact details, give them the names of the agencies from your last two gigs, assuming you weren't direct...
This is the right approach. At the end of the day you are not contracting to the end client (however you may represent it in LinkedIn) but to the agency.
In my current gig, one of the big names in Finance, all my references where the agency names and I also provided my Accountant's reference. Agent was in fact very happy to speak to the Accountant and the deal was done. I don't remember the name of the vetting agency, but I am very sure it is here in CUK.
Mr Button, it's not self-obsession that I am displaying, just a genuine concern and determination to understand the logic behind their requests as this is the first I have ever had in all my 7 years of contracting. Fair to question, don't ya think.
Leave a comment:
-
//It's the agency internal onboarding team ....
Its very likely that you are contracting with one of the Indian consultancies like Wipro, TCS, Cognizant and so on. Once they even asked where my father was born and what was his qualification...lol
//As for referee contact details, give them the names of the agencies from your last two gigs, assuming you weren't direct...
This is the right approach. At the end of the day you are not contracting to the end client (however you may represent it in LinkedIn) but to the agency.
In my current gig, one of the big names in Finance, all my references where the agency names and I also provided my Accountant's reference. Agent was in fact very happy to speak to the Accountant and the deal was done. I don't remember the name of the vetting agency, but I am very sure it is here in CUK.
Leave a comment:
-
What Mr Button said above.Originally posted by ziggystardust View PostIt's not even the consultant requesting the information. It's the agency internal onboarding team and today the call was not from my direct consultant, but from a resourcer whom I have never even dealt with...strange how they have needed the CV urgently 'today' for the last 4 days.....
Leave a comment:
-
It's not even the consultant requesting the information. It's the agency internal onboarding team and today the call was not from my direct consultant, but from a resourcer whom I have never even dealt with...strange how they have needed the CV urgently 'today' for the last 4 days.....
Leave a comment:
-
Just seems like the standard level of incompetence from an agent.
Oh and the standard level of self obsession from a contractor.
Solution: Who cares. Resend your CV.
Leave a comment:
-
Feel free. I can't see what doing that will achieve to be honest but if you think that you've won something when you'll probably provide it when it all gets a bit shirty anyway then fill your boots.Originally posted by ziggystardust View PostI am opted out. Not sure why they are so hellbent on dates. Apparently it is the client's auditor who is asking for this information. I am inclined to dig my heels in as this is not my problem? They gave me the contract based on the original CV I submitted. So it doesn't make sense
Leave a comment:
-
I am opted out. Not sure why they are so hellbent on dates. Apparently it is the client's auditor who is asking for this information. I am inclined to dig my heels in as this is not my problem? They gave me the contract based on the original CV I submitted. So it doesn't make senseOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostThis, although 2 mails AND a phone call would indicate he's not backing down so I'd say you are going to have to comply.
General housekeeping aside, if they think you are opted in they should have done this as part of their responsibilities. Quite possible they've paid it lip service and are scrabbling to fix it.
It's not personal stuff so I'd be inclined to provide it... but drip feed it. One ref one week, the next the other week and so on. Enough to say you are actioning it but just not quickly enough to meet his timescales
Leave a comment:
-
This, although 2 mails AND a phone call would indicate he's not backing down so I'd say you are going to have to comply.Originally posted by Lance View Postring the consultant back and give him a bollocking (express your displeasure) for messing you around.
If it's really important he'll let you know. He'd rather have the argument and keep you onsite if it's important to him.
General housekeeping aside, if they think you are opted in they should have done this as part of their responsibilities. Quite possible they've paid it lip service and are scrabbling to fix it.
It's not personal stuff so I'd be inclined to provide it... but drip feed it. One ref one week, the next the other week and so on. Enough to say you are actioning it but just not quickly enough to meet his timescales
Leave a comment:
-
ring the consultant back and give him a bollocking (express your displeasure) for messing you around.Originally posted by ziggystardust View PostSo do I have to comply? I ignored them and have since had 2 emails saying the information has to be provided 'today' on different days and a phone message from the consultant
..
If it's really important he'll let you know. He'd rather have the argument and keep you onsite if it's important to him.
Leave a comment:
-
So do I have to comply? I ignored them and have since had 2 emails saying the information has to be provided 'today' on different days and a phone message from the consultantOriginally posted by GreenMirror View PostThey want to get an ISO rating. Audit shows they do not do the necessary.
One previous job(permie) asked for a personal reference. I thought of getting one of the dodgy CUK posters(is that an oxymoron?) to provide but finally settled on a Doctor. It proves nothing - just to get ISO.
..
Leave a comment:
-
They want to get an ISO rating. Audit shows they do not do the necessary.Originally posted by ziggystardust View PostYes but it doesn't explain why they're now after just the months of all my contracts. Why now?!
One previous job(permie) asked for a personal reference. I thought of getting one of the dodgy CUK posters(is that an oxymoron?) to provide but finally settled on a Doctor. It proves nothing - just to get ISO.
Leave a comment:
-
In that case, politely but firmly state that nothing has changed since you completed compliance with them at the time of first engagement.Originally posted by ziggystardust View PostNo it wasn't. The process went on for about 3 weeks. All required documents/information met their compliance criteria. Hence why I was then given a contract.
Or ignore them first then do the above if they persist.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes but it doesn't explain why they're now after just the months of all my contracts. Why now?!Originally posted by ContractorScum View PostMaybe the agency playing tricks to get you to hand over previous client contact details?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Leave a comment: