Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: agents fighting over a candidate
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "agents fighting over a candidate"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostUnfortunately I've also been in more or less the same situation and i got turned down by the client in the car park before the interview because the agents were giving him grief. I'm sure I got unlucky and more often than not it can be worked out as you say.
I'm just wary now and avoidance of the situation is the best defense.
Leave a comment:
-
Updates: nobody got in touch with me. Not the client nor the agent. Client most likely dropped me.
Oh well, live and learn, I suppose.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostUnfortunately I've also been in more or less the same situation and i got turned down by the client in the car park before the interview because the agents were giving him grief. I'm sure I got unlucky and more often than not it can be worked out as you say.
I'm just wary now and avoidance of the situation is the best defense.
It's happened a few times over the years. Agents are like dogs fighting over a bone, or NLUK & Old Greg fighting to get the first barbed comment into a thread. Nobody comes out a winner.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostThat's right. It takes effort that some clients don't want to spend, not because they are lazy, but because they have better things to do with their time.
Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostThere's no moral or fiscal imperative for clients to become experts at finding the best contractors.
Also, there's definitely a quality imperative. Assuming, as a client, you give a sh!t about the quality of the work performed on your behalf.
Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostThey just want someone to come in and do a competent job.Last edited by billybiro; 18 May 2018, 12:45.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by billybiro View PostAnd you clearly have no idea that it's possible to think outside of the box and recruit in other ways other than the usual "post a job advert and wait for the flood of inappropriate responses".
<snip>
Of course, the reason no client does this is because it takes effort. And virtually all clients who rely upon recruitment agents to provide them with contractors and staff are incredibly lazy in this regard.
If I was looking for a permie, yeah, that might be worth a little more creativity and effort to make sure you got the right guy. A six-month guy? Forget it, I don't have time. Just send me a few candidates after filtering out the obvious incompetents. The better you filter them, the more likely I am to come back to you next time.
There's no moral or fiscal imperative for clients to become experts at finding the best contractors. The real clients have no need to be skilled at it, and HR is more focused on hiring employees. If a contractor hire goes bad, just dump him and get another one. I don't know what world you live in that you think clients should be creative about looking for contractors, but it's not the one most clients know. Their world does not revolve around contractors, they want to think about contractors as little as possible. They just want someone to come in and do a competent job.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostTo cut out the CVs that come from people without work permits. To cut out the people who think that having once created a powerpoint qualifies them to be a test of a complex system.
They match keywords from their job advert to keywords on the CV's which means that a client who wants someone skilled in Ubuntu (a Linux distro) will probably not get matched to the guy who has "Linux expert" on his CV. Once those facile keywords are matched, the agent phones the candidate. "Do you know Ubuntu?" "Sure, I know Ubuntu. I'm an expert!". That guy goes in the "send-these-to-the-client" pile. Of course, some chancer who knows nothing about IT couldn't possibly bullsh!t the agent at this stage, could they?
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostYou clearly have absolutely no clue of the scale of the work involved. You should try it sometime. If you're ever given that level of responsibility, which I sincerely hope you never do.
For what it's worth, I have had to review dozens of CV's that have been sent to me via a recruitment agent. It's absolutely crystal clear that their methods of filtering are exactly as effective as those I describe above.
Just as savvy contractors will maintain a network of clients whom they can lean on for work, it's possible for clients to do the same thing effectively in reverse. Keep a PSL of contractors, Network with contractors whom they've had good experience with and ask about their contractor friends also, attend industry events and meetups etc. etc. etc.
Of course, the reason no client does this is because it takes effort. And virtually all clients who rely upon recruitment agents to provide them with contractors and staff are incredibly lazy in this regard.
It's no surprise that many clients in the internet space - i.e. big technology brands - (just as an example), who want to recruit the very best people, absolutely do NOT use recruitment agencies in any capacity whatsoever.
Leave a comment:
-
Having recruited in the past, I can say that my experience is hit and miss.
As the client, the agency wants your money and are therefore far nicer to you than they are to candidates - they're never in meetings like they are when you ring as a candidate. Funny that.
I've found the best way to get them working for you is to meet with them. Works for niche and for those where there are plenty of candidates. You simply need to be very precise about what you're asking for; in niche areas, there are certain things that you can search for, while in areas with lots of candidates, you'd have other key differentiators.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostTo cut out the CVs that come from people without work permits. To cut out the people who think that having once created a powerpoint qualifies them to be a test of a complex system. To arrange interviews on your behalf. On occasion to actually find people with rare skills who are unlikely to respond to an advert, but might respond to a telephone call or email. To reduce the number of suppliers... Things like that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrButton View PostOnly once. The HR director pulled an interview I was meant to be doing as another agent came forward and kicked up a fuss about having an agreement first.
He couldn’t be bothered with getting “proof” or having to make a decision so binned it totally.
(He was a massive ego twunt though so maybe not a good example to base it on)
Originally posted by billybiro View PostThen why do they use them?
Originally posted by billybiro View PostIt's entirely possible for any client to recruit both staff and contractors without necessitating the use of an agency if they're not bone-idle lazy in this regard, you know!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostIt's a damned good question. With linkedin, jobserve and other social media agents are hardly needed. And are incredibly expensive.
In fact, the question was partially rhetorical. I think I know the answer, and I'll answer it by quoting from one of my all time favourite articles regarding recruitment agencies:
"Many organisations think themselves too busy to filter and headhunt. They don’t perceive the value of hiring well or the damage a few sleazebags can do to their reputation. Recruitment consultants promise to make hiring problem go away and companies – particularly lazy ones – soon grow dependent upon them."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by billybiro View PostThen why do they use them?
It's entirely possible for any client to recruit both staff and contractors without necessitating the use of an agency if they're not bone-idle lazy in this regard, you know!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHad to can an agency a couple of times for threatening candidates they lost out on. Most satisfying. What people fail often to understand is that clients tend to have as high a regard towards agencies as contractors do.
It's entirely possible for any client to recruit both staff and contractors without necessitating the use of an agency if they're not bone-idle lazy in this regard, you know!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHad to can an agency a couple of times for threatening candidates they lost out on. Most satisfying. What people fail often to understand is that clients tend to have as high a regard towards agencies as contractors do.
Leave a comment:
-
Happened to my wife (not in IT) who was going for permie role. Got really messy, client was interested, then gave up when they were in the middle of a bun fight.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: