I just remember Hays getting all sniffy when you asked to make any alterations to the contract (after a review), but once you said fine, I can't do the gig then, they would suddenly allow them.
qh
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Working for IBM outside IR35 ?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Working for IBM outside IR35 ?"
Collapse
-
NP. Hopefully we'll see your Boomed thread in General soon.Originally posted by Platypus View PostThanks all, sorry for the belated reply, but very helpful replies. TY.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks all, sorry for the belated reply, but very helpful replies. TY.
Leave a comment:
-
I've just been sent through a Hays contract which they wanted signed without seeing the schedule or the ACL (acceptance criteria letter) even though the contract references criteria in the ACL in some clauses. This would make it difficult to sign as I don't know if the ACL terms are acceptable. I'm not sure what version of the contract this was as I couldn't see the number anywhere but on an initial run through I turned it down.
There were also a few other things I didn't like - such as requesting permission for time off from the agency and client, being able to audit my company without notice. And a D&C one which was not as flexible. In fact some of these terms when I searched on these forums came up in a couple of posts from a year or so ago so I am unsure if I have an older version of the contract.
This is not for IBM though. They may possibly be amenable to changes I don't know but I am in a position where I don't have to take it and have another offer on the table with a more 'friendly' contract which I don't have to probably jump through hoops to have changed. If I didn't have this backup then I may have tried to get the terms altered.
Just editing to say that I had a response back and they will not change the terms as they are used by all contractors in the UK and Qdos have in the past accepted the terms and will indemnify contractors for IR35.
Leave a comment:
-
Three years ago Hays were willing to change my contract after it initially failed QDos review (was not for IBM though)
Leave a comment:
-
The standard Hays terms ('PSC ToA HSR 03.17' - believe these are the most recent) are, in our opinion, IR35 friendly. Obviously this doesn't take into account any client/role specific schedules or appendices which should be individually checked.
Leave a comment:
-
That was a long time ago. Couple of threads on it in the past but I'm sure there are others more recently that have stated the situation has changed.
Edit : That said I can't find any threads specifically stating all the contracts are IR35 friendly. There are a couple of posts from people saying it was OK for them or Hays was willing to change it post review from QDOS though.
I'd be surprised if S3's aren't with the amount of time Andy Hallett spent on here.Last edited by northernladuk; 18 October 2017, 22:54.
Leave a comment:
-
Working for IBM outside IR35 ?
Hi there, is anyone contracted to IBM UK through S3 / Hays and - crucially - outside IR35?
If yes, please PM me.... I've heard that Hays contracts are not IR35-friendly.
TIA !Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Leave a comment: