Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How to be the best pal of both parties.?"
So for example if there is a deadline when stuff has to be delivered you talk about the deadline at length then eventually say it isn't possible due to that restriction.
Usual issues when you are the point of interface to a demanding client (6 PMs + 3 Prgm Mgers) and working for a vendor that tries to save every penny and keep resource level to minimum!!
So had to say 'No' to 'nice to have' requests from client PMs/PrgMs and focused on 'Must have' items. Nothing more!!
It's not what you say but how you say it.
So for example if there is a deadline when stuff has to be delivered you talk about the deadline at length then eventually say it isn't possible due to that restriction.
Perhaps if you provide details of "rubbing the wrong way" we might be able to advise you how it could have been avoided. Kinda hard to provide you with silver bullet formula for any possible situation in the future...
Sounds like the service provider was a client of your ClientCo, hence by extension your client, if they weren't impressed by your service in the past it's no wonder they decided to drop your application in this case.
Usual issues when you are the point of interface to a demanding client (6 PMs + 3 Prgm Mgers) and working for a vendor that tries to save every penny and keep resource level to minimum!!
So had to say 'No' to 'nice to have' requests from client PMs/PrgMs and focused on 'Must have' items. Nothing more!!
Perhaps if you provide details of "rubbing the wrong way" we might be able to advise you how it could have been avoided. Kinda hard to provide you with silver bullet formula for any possible situation in the future...
Sounds like the service provider was a client of your ClientCo, hence by extension your client, if they weren't impressed by your service in the past it's no wonder they decided to drop your application in this case.
Don't rub anyone the wrong way? I know it seems pretty obvious but that in itself is a key skill. Especially where the two parties are supposed to be working together.
Don't rub anyone the wrong way? I know it seems pretty obvious but that in itself is a key skill. Especially where the two parties are supposed to be working together.
My last few gigs putting me in a bit of trouble it seems!
In that last gig I was contracted to a equipment vendor working with a service provider client. I made sure I serve the best for the vendor which means had to rub service provider client colleagues in the wrong way more than once. My vendor employer is absolutely happy with me start to finish but looks like the client side still have some grievances. I worked there nearly 2 years so wasn't bad with delivery to the client.
I just got a rejection notice for a role with that service provider client after a tele chat which I thought finished excellent! (this is different rejection from the one I mentioned in my other post related to hiring manager!!). This role was with another business unit of client co and people I worked in the past not involved in the process directly.
Is there a better way to make both parties happy and not to burn bridges with other party without making your employer asking "are you working for me or them"..??
Leave a comment: