- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Winding up
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Winding up"
Collapse
-
I guess my thinking on this was that there is an overlap in the cover of the two 'insurances'. The overlap being cover for IR35 tax investigation. I thought (and this is the unclear bit) that the additional cover given by IPSE+ are things such as additional tax investigation protection, eg VAt inspection, Jury cover, agency going bust cover, industry representation etc. My thoughts were that these last items I don't need now as I wont be working this tax year (very confident my VAt and other tax affairs are ok as I have a good accountant). That is why I am unsure if spending £300 (approx) is throwing money away.
-
Originally posted by billridley View PostSo near to retirement I could not afford to take any chances even though I am confident that I am outside the legislation. Gave me peace of mind.To me, these 2 statements appear contradictory. If you can't afford to take any chances, how can you afford not to renew these insurances?Originally posted by billridley View Postprior to that date my IPSE+ and IR35 Insurance comes up for renewal. I reckon I don't need the additional cover provided by IPSE + and intend to only renew the IR35 insurance for the next covering year. Is this a sensible approach or will IPSE + provide me with additional cover which is essential. Cheers
Leave a comment:
-
Better to have something and not need it rather than other way round.
qh
Leave a comment:
-
personally I'd keep IPSE+ and ditch the IR35 insurance. IPSE will provide legal help, if not underwrite any losses. But I guess it depends how at risk you are of losing an IR35 battle.
Leave a comment:
-
Winding up
Decided to call it a day and retire. Didn't do too much last financial year. Only a few months. Prior to that fully employed contracting going back 3 years. Would appreciate some advice please. I have always been cautious and had contracts reviewed for IR35 compliance, also taken out IPSE + and IR35 insurance. So near to retirement I could not afford to take any chances even though I am confident that I am outside the legislation. Gave me peace of mind. I intend to draw a salary and close the company in August, prior to that date my IPSE+ and IR35 Insurance comes up for renewal. I reckon I don't need the additional cover provided by IPSE + and intend to only renew the IR35 insurance for the next covering year. Is this a sensible approach or will IPSE + provide me with additional cover which is essential. CheersTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Leave a comment: