- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Escape agency contract for new contract with same Client"
Collapse
-
If there is anything in the contract about breaching data confidentiality then in theory you could call time on the contract because they are in breach.
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View PostA one year restriction is very enforceable.
I've had a contract with no handcuff clause simply due to the large size of the client.
I know other people who when there were attempts to enforce their clause they failed due to the role they did, the wording, length of restriction and/or size of the client.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View PostA one year restriction is very enforceable.
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIt could be in specific cases. I'm not sure an agent trying to protect their revenue stream when dealing with short term gigs would be one of them if it went to court. Devil is in the details really I would have thought?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View PostA one year restriction is very enforceable.
Leave a comment:
-
A couple of things don't seem right in your opening post and if you are going to get in to handcuff fights with agents you need to be absolutely sure and correct.
Originally posted by PlanContractor84 View PostI have operated as Ltd Co. for four years always through agencies without any issues. I am currently 10 months into my current contract via a consultancy who always work as an agency. I have had no contact with them during my assignment apart from initial phone conversation to set up meetings and the odd emails regarding invoicing. Recently I have found out that the agency has been sharing my invoice information with a colleague (who is also contracted through them) and also increased their charges to the client without me seeing any benefit.
The client has approached me about starting on a new assignment: different project/location/rate etc, and I'm keen to do this direct and not use the agency. Whether or not I will continue to have input into my current assignment on a part-time basis is tbd.
I'd be very careful about input in to your previous assignment. This could very easily end up looking like D&C and from there you becoming part and parcel. The longer your contract continues the more likely this is to happen. Whatever happens with the agency you need to be very careful going forward.
The applicable clause in my contract with agency reads as follows: "The Consultant agrees that for a period of one year after the Operative(s) has (have) completed the Assignment under this Agreement, the Consultant will not undertake work direct for the Client or any subsidiary company of the Client in conflict with the interests of the Company." It may be worth noting that my contract has no end date and does not read specific to an assignment (learning curve!) although it was accepted that I was taken on for a specific project.
12 months is generally considered too long for a handcuff but that's only going to stand up in court. 99.9% of time it won't get there. There will be handbags between the three of you normally resulting in the client or you backing off as it's too expensive to go to court. The agent would have a slam dunk case otherwise.
I see my options as follows: 1. Set up another Ltd Co (not ideal),
2. Work via an Umbrella Co (no experience of this),
3. Continue to do a limited number of hours on current assignment so that it has not 'completed',
4. Argue with agency that I am not happy with service or professionalism and the clause will limit my potential to earn?
I would appreciate views from anyone with greater knowledge or experience..? ThankyouLast edited by Contractor UK; 12 October 2018, 21:49.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostIf it came to court, then one year exclusion would probably be considered too long.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostIf it came to court, then one year exclusion would probably be considered too long. The clause "in conflict with the interests of the Company" is could also be a weakness.
Note though - I'm using "probably", "could be", because little is certain. If you take the new contract and the agency/consultancy takes legal action against you and/or the client, then if it goes to court a judge will decide if the handcuff clause is reasonable. The fact is, the client is unlikely to want to take the risk - it depends on their relationship with the agency/consultancy. Some clients are big enough they can just tell them to suck it up.
If the consultancy/agency has been sharing confidential information that it should not have been, you probably have a case under the Data Protection Act. This is a separate issue.
I have been in a similar situation a couple of times, but as the client spent such big ££££, the consultancy and on another occasion the agency just waived it through.
Best way, everyone's happy and you can forget all about the legal BS.
Leave a comment:
-
If it came to court, then one year exclusion would probably be considered too long. The clause "in conflict with the interests of the Company" is could also be a weakness.
Note though - I'm using "probably", "could be", because little is certain. If you take the new contract and the agency/consultancy takes legal action against you and/or the client, then if it goes to court a judge will decide if the handcuff clause is reasonable. The fact is, the client is unlikely to want to take the risk - it depends on their relationship with the agency/consultancy. Some clients are big enough they can just tell them to suck it up.
If the consultancy/agency has been sharing confidential information that it should not have been, you probably have a case under the Data Protection Act. This is a separate issue.
Leave a comment:
-
Escape agency contract for new contract with same Client
I have operated as Ltd Co. for four years always through agencies without any issues. I am currently 10 months into my current contract via a consultancy who always work as an agency. I have had no contact with them during my assignment apart from initial phone conversation to set up meetings and the odd emails regarding invoicing. Recently I have found out that the agency has been sharing my invoice information with a colleague (who is also contracted through them) and also increased their charges to the client without me seeing any benefit.
The client has approached me about starting on a new assignment: different project/location/rate etc, and I'm keen to do this direct and not use the agency. Whether or not I will continue to have input into my current assignment on a part-time basis is tbd.
The applicable clause in my contract with agency reads as follows: "The Consultant agrees that for a period of one year after the Operative(s) has (have) completed the Assignment under this Agreement, the Consultant will not undertake work direct for the Client or any subsidiary company of the Client in conflict with the interests of the Company." It may be worth noting that my contract has no end date and does not read specific to an assignment (learning curve!) although it was accepted that I was taken on for a specific project.
I see my options as follows: 1. Set up another Ltd Co (not ideal), 2. Work via an Umbrella Co (no experience of this), 3. Continue to do a limited number of hours on current assignment so that it has not 'completed', 4. Argue with agency that I am not happy with service or professionalism and the clause will limit my potential to earn?
I would appreciate views from anyone with greater knowledge or experience..? ThankyouTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: