
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Question regarding SC
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Question regarding SC"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Carbon22 View PostBut during the time of the checks, the clearance is still active, correct?
There is one thing to remember: clearance is about risk assessment, nothing else. There are no hard and fast boundaries, and it is all totally dependent on the particular needs of the role. MOD and Police SC are comparable, for example, but weight various criteria differently; you can hold one and be refused for the other. So asking for yes or no answers is not going to work. And security is maintained by more systems than a piece of paper saying you have clearance for your role.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostWhat will happen is the local SSO will read the form, do a couple of basic background checks and assess if the new partner represents a significant risk, then go from there. There's not a lot you can do about it, so don't worry, especially if the other half is basically a good security risk. And if they aren't there still isn't a lot you can do about it , although, as you suspect, you may well need a new gig.
Leave a comment:
-
What will happen is the local SSO will read the form, do a couple of basic background checks and assess if the new partner represents a significant risk, then go from there. There's not a lot you can do about it, so don't worry, especially if the other half is basically a good security risk. And if they aren't there still isn't a lot you can do about it , although, as you suspect, you may well need a new gig.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSeriously though. I've read through some of the forms and no where does it mention you'd get taken off your tasks or anything would change. It just says a risk assessment would taken out and if needed the vetting process carried out. I'd imagine you'd just carry on as normal. In many SC environments you can work without it, you just have to be supervised and escorted so at worst that's what they would do but I can't see that mentioned anywhere.
Are you in the situation where the person you are living with may need extra attention? Foreign, got form etc? If not I can't see why they would suspend access just because you start living with someone.
Could depend on the role I guess as well.
I can't help but think it'd cause chaos if sc was revoked every time someone moved in with someone, don't you think?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carbon22 View PostThat was my thought as well, there seems to be no information at all stating that it's revoked whilst they check on the circumstances.
Thanks for the input!
You coming on the Leeds meet tomorrow? Brewery Tap on New Station Street, bring your wallet....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSeriously though. I've read through some of the forms and no where does it mention you'd get taken off your tasks or anything would change. It just says a risk assessment would taken out and if needed the vetting process carried out. I'd imagine you'd just carry on as normal. In many SC environments you can work without it, you just have to be supervised and escorted so at worst that's what they would do but I can't see that mentioned anywhere.
Thanks for the input!
Leave a comment:
-
Seriously though. I've read through some of the forms and no where does it mention you'd get taken off your tasks or anything would change. It just says a risk assessment would taken out and if needed the vetting process carried out. I'd imagine you'd just carry on as normal. In many SC environments you can work without it, you just have to be supervised and escorted so at worst that's what they would do but I can't see that mentioned anywhere.
Are you in the situation where the person you are living with may need extra attention? Foreign, got form etc? If not I can't see why they would suspend access just because you start living with someone.
Could depend on the role I guess as well.Last edited by northernladuk; 16 August 2016, 18:37.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostA series is, informally speaking, the sum of the terms of an infinite sequence. The sum of a finite sequence has defined first and last terms, whereas a series continues indefinitely.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carbon22 View PostBrilliant. If possible, i'd really like a series answer on this...
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carbon22 View Post"0 Friends
stek has not made any friends yet"
There's a surprise.
Actually I've just remembered I do know the answer to your question, but I'm not going to tell you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stek View PostYou'll not get one now, the pile-on has begun....
It's traditional to be sensible in all forums but General, where anything goes. It's also traditional to prod the mods in the series forums until the ban hammer falls.
Join in, have a laugh and someone will take pity and answer, act like stuffed shirt (i.e. like you already have) and the piss taking will continue.
FWIW I don't know the answer, just enjoying the pile on....
"0 Friends
stek has not made any friends yet"
There's a surprise.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carbon22 View PostBrilliant. If possible, i'd really like a series answer on this...
It's traditional to be sensible in all forums but General, where anything goes. It's also traditional to prod the mods in the series forums until the ban hammer falls.
Join in, have a laugh and someone will take pity and answer, act like stuffed shirt (i.e. like you already have) and the piss taking will continue.
FWIW I don't know the answer, just enjoying the pile on....
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
Leave a comment: