Originally posted by missinggreenfields
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Fighting Back Against Late Payment Culture"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostI don't see the business case.
How does a B2B Agency-Review site make any money?
Leave a comment:
-
I don't see the business case.
How does a B2B Agency-Review site make any money?
Leave a comment:
-
Confidential info and non-disclosure agreements
Hi everyone,
I've been checking up on where such a B2B review website would stand with the law. I've categorised all the information in this spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...ZCbQmU/pubhtml
Basically, the conclusion of my research is:
1. It is illegal for the subcontractor to send confidential information whether he has signed a confidentiality agreement or not.
2. It would be illegal for a B2B review website to disclose any information to the public if the information were suspected to be confidential.
3. The court can order the B2B review website to remove any review which the main contractor declares confidential.
4. The B2B review website is not allowed to publish posts which the B2B review website considers not true.
However:
5. Before any court orders the B2B review website to remove a review, they have to take into consideration the B2B review website's right to freedom of speech.
6. The B2B review website can re-post a review containing confidential information if it is proved in court to be in the public interest.
7. Confidentiality is a public right, and in the end, the court will have to judge whether the right of confidentiality is more important than the right of public interest. This will need to be judged on a case by case basis.
8. The B2B review website can publish confidential information as evidence that the main contractor has broken the law.
From a legal standpoint, continuing with a B2B review website is gonna be really tough. However, No.6 above does offer a way forward. It would definitely be in the public interest for the public to know which companies are late payers, and which companies are abusing their position by demanding extortionate trade credit from their suppliers.
The B2B review website would need to crowd-fund a bunch of legal cases to set a precedent. Only then would the main contractors think twice about getting take-down notices issued by the courts.
I hope this will be food for thought for you. Let me know what you think.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yasockie View PostPast performance is no indication for the future - everything was fine and dandy with my agency until the money ran out.
And they did take a few poor souls on board in the last few months to keep the boat afloat but it didn't help.
Guess who lost the money (hint: not the agency directors - it is Ltd after all)
Leave a comment:
-
Past performance is no indication for the future - everything was fine and dandy with my agency until the money ran out.
And they did take a few poor souls on board in the last few months to keep the boat afloat but it didn't help.
Guess who lost the money (hint: not the agency directors - it is Ltd after all)
Leave a comment:
-
A big thanks for your help
Hi again everyone.
I'd just like to thank everyone who contributed to this thread. You've all been very helpful.
My apologies for not being able to get back to you all earlier. I've been posting on a few forums, not only in the IT contractor field, but I'm also interested in late payment across the whole economy. My research so far suggests that the worst offenders are supermarket chains and main contractors in the construction industry. There seems to be something funny going on with the investors in the construction industry too, but I haven't got to the bottom of it yet.
From your responses, it seems that there is no real need for a review site for agents in the IT contractor field, however, because the website will be very general, they'll be no reason why someone from your field won't be able to leave a review.
Once again, thanks for your input.
Chris
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostSo maybe not a goer, and I guess there is also likely to be any number of legal implications with any such review site.
Leave a comment:
-
Possibly, and I could equally be doing the OP a disservice
I have a bit of a downer on Ambulance Chasers at the moment especially of the Bob variety foul mouthed little barstewards who don't like being told no thankyou
Swmbo was being plagued to death with them here, constantly calling about a no fault no injury accident my son had 2 years ago on his Motorbike.
Often 10-15 calls a day
So I bought a Truecall device, which gives full control over who gets through, peace has returned.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DallasDad View PostFTFY
Another OP that has disappeared of the face of the planet
I wonder if he is really developing a new angle on Ambulance Chasing, tailored to miffed contractors!
Eeek!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by itschrisnow View PostI belong to a group of specialist Ambulance Chasers
Another OP that has disappeared of the face of the planet
I wonder if he is really developing a new angle on Ambulance Chasing, tailored to miffed contractors!
Eeek!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
I always ask the second question first and get email confirmation. I can influence the first question later.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
There are two key things for me for an agency:
Is the agency's standard contract template IR35-friendly and matches the working practices?
Are they on a percentage commission or do they operate on fixed budget?
I always ask the second question first and get email confirmation. I can influence the first question later.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: