• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Notice Period

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Notice Period"

Collapse

  • I just need to test it
    replied
    Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
    So for £500 (example) you'd refuse to work with someone whos a bit wiffy? Seriously.
    Yeah. It's a curse sometimes but I have standards.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlipTheJab
    replied
    Originally posted by I just need to test it View Post
    Stale sweat. I think that's possibly where I draw the line on working with someone.
    But fresh sweat pouring down his chubby cheeks is ok

    Leave a comment:


  • psychocandy
    replied
    Originally posted by I just need to test it View Post
    Stale sweat. I think that's possibly where I draw the line on working with someone.
    So for £500 (example) you'd refuse to work with someone whos a bit wiffy? Seriously.

    Leave a comment:


  • I just need to test it
    replied
    Stale sweat. I think that's possibly where I draw the line on working with someone.

    Leave a comment:


  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by CheshireBoy View Post
    Hi All,

    Last year I had a contract with a company. After a few days I told the boss I could not work with person x and the boss told me 'the only thing he can do here is end the agreement' and I will be paid for what I have done (which was a few days).

    My contract states that I would be given 4 weeks notice which obviously I wasn't,

    Do I have a case to seek 4 weeks of my day rate?

    Thanks all
    plot twist:
    company is Real Madrid Club de Futbol
    CheshireBoy is Rafael Benitez
    person x is Cristiano Ronaldo

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by CheshireBoy View Post
    but nor do I put money over self respect.
    Well... you were looking to make a claim for work you didn't do because you didn't want to. I.e. you were looking for some contract loophole to allow you to do what would have amounted to theft.

    Leave a comment:


  • psychocandy
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Name and shame himself.

    I'm more curious as to why they felt that they couldn't work with someone else.
    and me. Go on OP what was the issue?

    I've met loads of cockheads at client sites but none of them bad enough that I cant suck it up for at least 3 months.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by CheshireBoy View Post
    Firstly,

    Thank you all for you input. I think NorthernLad hit the nail on the head about the signed time sheet dependency. Thank you.

    Though some other peoples comments and one from NorthenrLad are a bit ' interesting'!

    Thinking you can get 4 weeks free money for welching on a gig is just.... mehhhhhhh

    I was merely asking, not expecting.

    Unprofessional was another

    Name and Shame myself Solidarity brothers!


    I take it you are all happy to be in contracts were you are spoken to like dog sh!t by 'colleagues' and given unrealistic requirements in unrealistic timelines. This gig was not like the 'tin said' an my days of been treated like sh!t in exchange for a day rate are behind me. And yes I did address with with the Senior LT etc.

    I am professional enough that I don't need to print the Name of the Employer and the bitchy facts, but nor do I put money over self respect.
    I was tongue in cheek with the name and shame - what was the unreasonable requirement?

    Leave a comment:


  • CheshireBoy
    replied
    Thank You

    Firstly,

    Thank you all for you input. I think NorthernLad hit the nail on the head about the signed time sheet dependency. Thank you.

    Though some other peoples comments and one from NorthenrLad are a bit ' interesting'!

    Thinking you can get 4 weeks free money for welching on a gig is just.... mehhhhhhh

    I was merely asking, not expecting.

    Unprofessional was another

    Name and Shame myself Solidarity brothers!


    I take it you are all happy to be in contracts were you are spoken to like dog sh!t by 'colleagues' and given unrealistic requirements in unrealistic timelines. This gig was not like the 'tin said' an my days of been treated like sh!t in exchange for a day rate are behind me. And yes I did address with with the Senior LT etc.

    I am professional enough that I don't need to print the Name of the Employer and the bitchy facts, but nor do I put money over self respect.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
    Maybe the other guy kept trying to lead him into a life of crime by insisting he helped himself to any office equipment that was 'lying around on the floor'
    D&C a definite issue there.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlipTheJab
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Name and shame himself.

    I'm more curious as to why they felt that they couldn't work with someone else.
    Maybe the other guy kept trying to lead him into a life of crime by insisting he helped himself to any office equipment that was 'lying around on the floor'

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Name and shame himself.

    I'm more curious as to why they felt that they couldn't work with someone else.
    Ahhh, got admit I'd be vaguely interested as well but have a feeling it might be a tad biased towards one party

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    You've got to be kidding right.. Naming and shaming client staff. Why on earth would you do that???

    Looking at the OPs posts he's in no position to be doing this even if it wasn't a stupid thing to do.
    Name and shame himself.

    I'm more curious as to why they felt that they couldn't work with someone else.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Out of interest, why? Bad enough to name and shame?
    You've got to be kidding right.. Naming and shaming client staff. Why on earth would you do that???

    Looking at the OPs posts he's in no position to be doing this even if it wasn't a stupid thing to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by CheshireBoy View Post
    Hi All,

    Last year I had a contract with a company. After a few days I told the boss I could not work with person x and the boss told me 'the only thing he can do here is end the agreement' and I will be paid for what I have done (which was a few days).

    My contract states that I would be given 4 weeks notice which obviously I wasn't,

    Do I have a case to seek 4 weeks of my day rate?

    Thanks all
    Out of interest, why? Bad enough to name and shame?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X