- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Should I (politely) decline 'staff' training?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Jakes Daddy View PostI'm contracting through my ltd co, and am based on-site at the client's site. I have been asked to complete some online 'staff' training, namely:- A Workstation assessment
- The Bribery Act 2010
- DSE
- Health and Safety and the Environment
- Information Security
The problem I have is the use of the term 'staff' in the email to me and also on the online training portal that I am expected to log into to take the training.
The reason I am particularly cautious is that this particular client has in the past been involved in a very high profile IR35 case where the contractor lost, in part because the client 'fessed up and declared that they treated this particular contractor like any other member of 'staff'
Thoughts anyone?
Leave a comment:
-
What SM said, it says "staff" not "employees". People really need to relax and no be so up tight about IR35 this, IR35 that. Get the contract reviewed, get an insurance if you like, don't do stupid tulip and carry on invoicing. Irritating the Client by digging in your heals for tulip like this is bad business.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jakes Daddy View PostI'm contracting through my ltd co, and am based on-site at the client's site. I have been asked to complete some online 'staff' training, namely:- A Workstation assessment
- The Bribery Act 2010
- DSE
- Health and Safety and the Environment
- Information Security
I don't have a huge problem with the content, and my written contract says (in the control section) that I will adhere to health and safety based control, so I guess some of this falls into that category. And the bribery and info sec content is valid as its relevant to the role and industry sector.
The problem I have is the use of the term 'staff' in the email to me and also on the online training portal that I am expected to log into to take the training.
The reason I am particularly cautious is that this particular client has in the past been involved in a very high profile IR35 case where the contractor lost, in part because the client 'fessed up and declared that they treated this particular contractor like any other member of 'staff'
Thoughts anyone?
Leave a comment:
-
That sounds like standard fare for a Financial Sector contract, be thankful you don't have to sit through TCF and FCA training as well. :rolleyes
Leave a comment:
-
Should I (politely) decline 'staff' training?
I'm contracting through my ltd co, and am based on-site at the client's site. I have been asked to complete some online 'staff' training, namely:- A Workstation assessment
- The Bribery Act 2010
- DSE
- Health and Safety and the Environment
- Information Security
I don't have a huge problem with the content, and my written contract says (in the control section) that I will adhere to health and safety based control, so I guess some of this falls into that category. And the bribery and info sec content is valid as its relevant to the role and industry sector.
The problem I have is the use of the term 'staff' in the email to me and also on the online training portal that I am expected to log into to take the training.
The reason I am particularly cautious is that this particular client has in the past been involved in a very high profile IR35 case where the contractor lost, in part because the client 'fessed up and declared that they treated this particular contractor like any other member of 'staff'
Thoughts anyone?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: