Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "‘Slash and burn’ of EU rules ruled out post-Brexit"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostWe have 1.5 months experience of no longer being in the EU maybe its worth waiting a few days before we rip it all up?
I know what did - they would not be much different than under EUSSR rule.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post4 years after it vote, and many years of advocating for it before - why that was not enough time to have specific much better than EU laws to be enacted on day 1?
Simple true answer is that they don’t exist because there ain’t any easy obvious laws that can suddenly make post-Brexit better, it was a all a lie and cretins like you bought it
We have centuries of experience with murder & abuse why do we not have laws that deal completely with those?
We have 1.5 months experience of no longer being in the EU maybe its worth waiting a few days before we rip it all up?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostNo but replacing them with knee jerk reactions would be bad.
Simple true answer is that they don’t exist because there ain’t any easy obvious laws that can suddenly make post-Brexit better, it was a all a lie and cretins like you bought it
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostEvery rule that needs to be reviewed and revised may improve the UK economy's prospects. Its not good or bad just something that needs to be done when you end a relationship.
An ex may have insisted you dressed in a certain way because she liked men in cardigans, or women in stockings now you can switch to lycra and tights if you want. You now decide, you might decide you like cardigans but you should think about it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostBut, if you agree the rules were not bad, then why do they need replacing at all? Every rule reviewed, re-written and replaced will cost the UK economy, a cost I'd argue we probably don't want just now
Every rule that needs to be reviewed and revised may improve the UK economy's prospects. Its not good or bad just something that needs to be done when you end a relationship.
An ex may have insisted you dressed in a certain way because she liked men in cardigans, or women in stockings now you can switch to lycra and tights if you want. You now decide, you might decide you like cardigans but you should think about it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostNo but replacing them with knee jerk reactions would be bad.
Leave a comment:
-
‘Slash and burn’ of EU rules ruled out post-Brexit
“ Duncan Smith says reform group advising PM would seek ‘fast and sensible’ regulatory changes
Boris Johnson’s adviser on regulatory reform, Iain Duncan Smith, has said he will not lead a “slash-and-burn exercise” when it comes to changing Britain’s post-Brexit rules.
Duncan Smith’s comments chime with warnings from business leaders that they do not want the UK prime minister to oversee a “bonfire” of EU red tape and instead want to see him focus on ensuring the government becomes “nimbler” at making new rules.
The idea of a post-Brexit conflagration, laying waste to what they see as stifling Brussels regulation, has been a staple of Eurosceptic discourse for years, but it is being quietly doused by the government.”
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
Ah so EU rules were not that bad after all...Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: