• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Turd removed from the sewer"

Collapse

  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Yes they were demilitarised initially and their factories were also dismantled and moved to allied countries, but in the 1950's they moved on.

    So presumably you're suggesting that a couple of years in the 1950's when the Germans had rebuilt some of their factories and didn't have any military spending is the reason for their success over the following 60 years.

    The UK dismantled German factories up until 1950. Surely getting "free" machines should have meant the UK would have a thriving industry.
    I'm suggesting that they had a reset and with new ideas coming in (no incumbent government for obvious reasons...) felt that with the nuclear age now upon us (them) then WW3 would be end of the world. Have a look at what we'd have saved if we hadn't had any defence spending since 1945.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Yes they were demilitarised initially and their factories were also dismantled and moved to allied countries, but in the 1950's they moved on.

    So presumably you're suggesting that a couple of years in the 1950's when the Germans had rebuilt some of their factories and didn't have any military spending is the reason for their success over the following 60 years.

    The UK dismantled German factories up until 1950. Surely getting "free" machines should have meant the UK would have a thriving industry.
    Not just that. There was also the establishment of the Saar protectorate, and post its reunification with Germany, French rights to extract coal until 1981.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    The Potsdam Agreement mainly.
    Yes they were demilitarised initially and their factories were also dismantled and moved to allied countries, but in the 1950's they moved on.

    So presumably you're suggesting that a couple of years in the 1950's when the Germans had rebuilt some of their factories and didn't have any military spending is the reason for their success over the following 60 years.

    The UK dismantled German factories up until 1950. Surely getting "free" machines should have meant the UK would have a thriving industry.
    Last edited by BlasterBates; 23 June 2020, 10:36.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Where do you get that from, that is complete nonsense or do you mean the period where Germany was just a load of ruins.

    The other myth about Germany getting more from the Marshall plan sounds better
    The Potsdam Agreement mainly.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    While the Germans had the acrimony of losing WW2, they were demilitarised, giving them a massive financial advantage of not having to worry about armed forces spending and could therefore concentrate on industrial efforts instead. Instead we ended up heavily unionised and outputting the Morris Marina and MG Maestro.
    Where do you get that from, that is complete nonsense or do you mean the period where Germany was just a load of ruins.

    The other myth about Germany getting more from the Marshall plan sounds better

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Whilst we are on the subject of turd removal, anybody heard from sas lately?

    Is he still attempting to ingratiate himself to Portuguese hill-bumpkins?

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    They were also massively deindustrialised and large amounts of intellectual property confiscated.
    Which also meant that they had the benefit of a greenfield site rather than the Victorian/Georgian imperialist "we're the best" mindset. We were in a position of triumphalism, debt and complacency.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    While the Germans had the acrimony of losing WW2, they were demilitarised, giving them a massive financial advantage of not having to worry about armed forces spending and could therefore concentrate on industrial efforts instead. Instead we ended up heavily unionised and outputting the Morris Marina and MG Maestro.
    They were also massively deindustrialised and large amounts of intellectual property confiscated.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    “How come the Germans do everything better, and when all we have to do is copy them, we fail?”
    Therein lies one of the most profound questions of modern British politics.
    While the Germans had the acrimony of losing WW2, they were demilitarised, giving them a massive financial advantage of not having to worry about armed forces spending and could therefore concentrate on industrial efforts instead. Instead we ended up heavily unionised and outputting the Morris Marina and MG Maestro.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by James Brokenshire;Today
    It is concerning to see the situation in Germany and it’s why we are informed in our actions by experience from around the world, why the chief scientific officer, the chief medical officer, speak to their counterparts in different parts of the world to ensure that we are applying the best learning and the best experience in informing our next steps.
    And then ignoring it...

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Because nobody knows where the Sudetenland is...

    Or, nobody wants (or has the balls to try) to tear up a thousand years of 'the British way of doing things' and adopt the German models of Government, democracy, education, and pretty much everything else which The Germans do differently. And yes, in some cases much better. Germany is a very young country, and after WWII they went back to square one. It isn't such a profound question when you're comparing apples with something that isn't apples.
    Well it looks like the UK government are starting to copy other countries ways of doing things, apart from moving to the Google/Apple method of the app, here's another one: Reopened pubs will take names and details of drinkers | News | The Times Maybe if the British government hadn't been so pig headed, the country wouldn't be in the state it is now but you get what you voted for...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Because nobody knows where the Sudetenland is...

    Or, nobody wants (or has the balls to try) to tear up a thousand years of 'the British way of doing things' and adopt the German models of Government, democracy, education, and pretty much everything else which The Germans do differently. And yes, in some cases much better. Germany is a very young country, and after WWII they went back to square one. It isn't such a profound question when you're comparing apples with something that isn't apples.
    well they did stop invading France, Poland & Belgium.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    “How come the Germans do everything better, and when all we have to do is copy them, we fail?”
    Therein lies one of the most profound questions of modern British politics.
    Because nobody knows where the Sudetenland is...

    Or, nobody wants (or has the balls to try) to tear up a thousand years of 'the British way of doing things' and adopt the German models of Government, democracy, education, and pretty much everything else which The Germans do differently. And yes, in some cases much better. Germany is a very young country, and after WWII they went back to square one. It isn't such a profound question when you're comparing apples with something that isn't apples.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Fuhrer Merkel will be most pleased.
    “How come the Germans do everything better, and when all we have to do is copy them, we fail?”
    Therein lies one of the most profound questions of modern British politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Fuhrer Merkel will be most pleased.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X