Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Chances of Brexit being reversed are one in three, says EU president Donald Tusk"
"[In reference to the long term NHS plan]The government said that under the plan by 2023-24, the NHS budget will increase by over £20billion a year in real terms, which is approximately £600million a week in cash terms."
Im guessing that this comes down to a fundamental non-understanding of who “the EU” is, and how it works.
Do you see “the EU” as a small cabal of unelected dictators? Or do you see it as a co-operative of 28 countries with elected representatives?
(Or somewhere in between)
I see it as somewhere in between. In particular, I see it as over bureaucratic. The annual trek between Luxembourg and Strasbourg is ridiculous. I think the pace of integration is much too fast and is swinging away from elected representatives to dictators. However, that may be for the best. And, of course, the UK government is far more dictatorial than the EU - I think the last 3 years have exposed that. While the UK is stuck with people who think they can only vote for 2 parties then the UK is doomed - inside or outside the EU.
Of course those are purely my personal opinion. Others may well disagree. And I have reached the stage now where I would support anything that would bring the UK closer. But it is hard to see what.
This micro-thread started from your post about the UK holding a referendum on Scotland leaving; if the EU held one to force the UK out, presumably that would be acceptable? (I mean personally, not legally - it’s not possible under current treaties)
I don't see why the EU should not boot out anyone they don't want.
To pick an extreme example, suppose a country re-introduced the death penalty? Surely booting them out would be acceptable?
I do appreciate that the EU generally tries to make things work.
Its not what I think. Its what the EU thinks. And that would be for the UK to stay.
And after the last 3 years I would not object to the UK staying.
I’m no longer so sure about that.
This micro-thread started from your post about the UK holding a referendum on Scotland leaving; if the EU held one to force the UK out, presumably that would be acceptable? (I mean personally, not legally - it’s not possible under current treaties)
The right result will always be the result most desired by those deciding on what the right result is.
But first we must have a referendum on whether we should have a referendum to decide if we should have a referendum on whether the UK should leave the EU or stay in the EU. That way we it will be clear that everyone knew what they were voting for.
Leave a comment: