Geoffrey Cox ordered to change his legal opinion to make everyone vote for the deal
It gets better. The EU's changes are clearly purely cosmetic.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Theresa May saves the day
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Theresa May saves the day"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by stonehenge View PostI wonder how much orchestration there was between No 10 and Brussels over yesterday's "miraculous 11th hour breakthrough"?
How many days have both sides been sat on that rabbit, waiting to pull it out of the hat?
The issue from the EU side is that the U.K. are unilaterally stating that they can withdraw from the backstop. Which, of course, the U.K. has always been free to do - there’s unilaterally withdrawing, and there are consequences for unilaterally withdrawing....
The U.K. is trying (succeeding?) in minimising the consequences of unilaterally withdrawing. By putting this into a codicil and formally tying it to the Withdrawal Agreement, the danger for the EU is that if they do not object to it then they may be seen to be implicitly agreeing to it. At any future arbitration, the U.K. can point to the unilateral statement and say that the EU didn’t object at the time, therefore they accepted it.
This might be enough to get the WA through the HoC.
Leave a comment:
-
As I suspected, just a bit of glitter to make it more attractive to the ugly ****ers in Parliament
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stonehenge View PostI wonder how much orchestration there was between No 10 and Brussels over yesterday's "miraculous 11th hour breakthrough"?
How many days have both sides been sat on that rabbit, waiting to pull it out of the hat?
Brexiters know that too which is why they don't like it. Their next plan, if May's deal was voted through, was to waste another 2 years until we get to the end of the transition period then crash out (as Davies has let out the bag) but the legal agreement May has will effectively stop that.
Brexiters think they are so clever, but are getting thwarted at every turn. They just can't act honestly. I don't know why the ERG don't just tell the truth and say they want a No Deal crash out and whatever other deal is put before them they will vote it down, rather than all this bultulip and lies.
But then their whole campaign is built on lies, they just don't know anymore where the lie ends and the truth begins.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostDavid Davis on Talk Radio now promising "no-deal" Brexit at the end of 2020, he sounds like he's caving, lots of stuff about it's the "remoaners" fault.
Of course
The humiliation is almost there. Julia Hartley-Brewer is not a happy bunny.
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder how much orchestration there was between No 10 and Brussels over yesterday's "miraculous 11th hour breakthrough"?
How many days have both sides been sat on that rabbit, waiting to pull it out of the hat?
Leave a comment:
-
David Davis on Talk Radio now promising "no-deal" Brexit at the end of 2020, he sounds like he's caving, lots of stuff about it's the "remoaners" fault.
Of course
The humiliation is almost there. Julia Hartley-Brewer is not a happy bunny.
Leave a comment:
-
Be interesting to hear the excuses now by the ERG and DUP for not supporting the deal. The blocker was always 'only' the backstop .... now May has delivered this to them and they should have no excuses, what will they come up with next
Of course, if you're a remainer MP voting against the May deal you're trying to frustrate Brexit, but no one ever says that about the ERG or DUP. Such hypocrites
Quite looking forward to tonight. May's deal kicked out again. Tomorrow, No Deal kicked out. Thursday, extension agreed. All this followed by a people's vote on either May's deal or Remain, with a remain resounding victory
Leave a comment:
-
Brexiteers looking for a way to cave.
It's like Trump and his renegotiated NAFTA.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostIf we can’t change the backstop, then we change the AGs legal advice on the backstop. Simples!
When was the last time we undertook something so serious on the back of flawed advice from the AG? Iraq?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stonehenge View PostThe backstop is no longer an issue. Everything is fine and dandy.
Just don't look too closely at it.
When was the last time we undertook something so serious on the back of flawed advice from the AG? Iraq?
Leave a comment:
-
Theresa May saves the day
The backstop is no longer an issue. Everything is fine and dandy.
Just don't look too closely at it.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: