Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Mini and Toyota to leave UK in case of no deal brexit"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostSo who in the leave campaign has been allowed to follow their plans through? Who is in charge of our negotiations with the EU?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostIt's a shame the Leave camp and its voters didn't do the same thing - carry out due diligence, come to a decision based on the risk assessment they have conducted, and come to a decision that is for the benefit of the United Kingdom, not just lining their own pockets with profits, or concerned about the last couple of years of their lives, and screw anyone under 60.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostYep, It should have all been done before we got anywhere near a referendum. This very question should have been asked in parliament when they were debating on whether or not to hold a referendum. It's call due diligence.
I still can't understand how we were given an option (to Leave) which would fook up an existing international treaty (the GFA).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostIt was done, by the Leave team. While they were doing their due diligence, they realised that there was no “one plan” that they could all unite around.
It was a deliberate decision to keep the campaign vague enough to appeal to all people.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostYep, It should have all been done before we got anywhere near a referendum. This very question should have been asked in parliament when they were debating on whether or not to hold a referendum. It's call due diligence.
It was a deliberate decision to keep the campaign vague enough to appeal to all people.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostIt's a shame the Leave camp and its voters didn't do the same thing - carry out due diligence, come to a decision based on the risk assessment they have conducted, and come to a decision that is for the benefit of the United Kingdom, not just lining their own pockets with profits, or concerned about the last couple of years of their lives, and screw anyone under 60.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostBut it does show, that unlike some businesses that are complaining, that their leadership has shown to have done their due diligence and come to a business decision based on the risk assessment they have conducted. In a nutshell, You and I may not like the decision but they have done the job they are paid to do and run the business for the sole benefit of their shareholders who only want a financial return on their investment.
It's a shame the Leave camp and its voters didn't do the same thing - carry out due diligence, come to a decision based on the risk assessment they have conducted, and come to a decision that is for the benefit of the United Kingdom, not just lining their own pockets with profits, or concerned about the last couple of years of their lives, and screw anyone under 60.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostAnd there’s the other set of people to blame, the shareholders.
Ever thought about sticking your hand up and admitting that it was your vote that got us in this position? Or leading Brexiters? Or anyone or anything on the Leave side?
I have no problem in holding my hand up and stating that I voted to leave, and given another chance I would do the same again, for the simple reason we would always be a vassal state whilst in the EU. Did you watch the TV documentary "Europe, 10 years in turmoil" I think it was called. there are too few counties in the EU that have all the power. It's in not a collection of 27 countries but the majority being dominated by the few.
Leave a comment:
-
Mini and Toyota to leave UK in case of no deal brexit
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostDid I ever say that was a good thing? But it does show, that unlike some businesses that are complaining, that their leadership has shown to have done their due diligence and come to a business decision based on the risk assessment they have conducted. In a nutshell, You and I may not like the decision but they have done the job they are paid to do and run the business for the sole benefit of their shareholders who only want a financial return on their investment.
Ever thought about sticking your hand up and admitting that it was your vote that got us in this position? Or leading Brexiters? Or anyone or anything on the Leave side?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostSo manufacturing businesses making a deliberate decision to not invest in the UK is a good thing?
Should have put that on the side of a bus, it sounds like a vote-winner.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostNot leaving. Just not making further investment for the time being. It’s their contingency plan.
According to you in another thread, it’s a good business decision for manufacturers to have contingency planning.[/QUOTE]
It is. It shows that the management are on top of things and considering all possibilities and not just sitting back building their pension pots and complaining when somebody else is not making their business decisions for them.Originally posted by meridian View PostSo manufacturing businesses making a deliberate decision to not invest in the UK is a good thing?
Should have put that on the side of a bus, it sounds like a vote-winner.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
It is. It shows that the management are on top of things and considering all possibilities and not just sitting back building their pension pots and complaining when somebody else is not making their business decisions for them.
Should have put that on the side of a bus, it sounds like a vote-winner.
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=meridian;2628961]Not leaving. Just not making further investment for the time being. It’s their contingency plan.
According to you in another thread, it’s a good business decision for manufacturers to have contingency planning.[/QUOTE]
It is. It shows that the management are on top of things and considering all possibilities and not just sitting back building their pension pots and complaining when somebody else is not making their business decisions for them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostVauxhall hasn't left Luton yet. Nor does it have any plans to do so as far as I am aware.
We'll all just have to drive Vauxhall Vivaros
According to you in another thread, it’s a good business decision for manufacturers to have contingency planning.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: