Originally posted by Whorty
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Barclays shifts billions of pounds to Dublin because of Brexit"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View PostAnd still there are uneducated brexidiots who believe that transfering £166B out of the country does not impact the economy of the UK in any way, because it says in the article not many jobs are at risk
I mean. it's simply pathetic how every industry and sector in the UK, except Dyson and 'Spoonies, can get it so wrong. They're all just not trying hard enough!
Anyone heard of a single sector, not an individual company like 'Spoonies with a vested interest, but a whole sector, that has said anything positive about the impact of brexit on their sector? Even the mighty fishing industry, which brexit is supposed to help, doesn't seem to like what brexit will deliver
Leave a comment:
-
The food trade seems to be getting hit more than the financial area, bacon and booze, two of the Brexiters favourites:
Oddbins prepares to appoint administrators - BBC News
Pork processor to cut hundreds of jobs
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View PostAnd still there are uneducated brexidiots who believe that transfering £166B out of the country does not impact the economy of the UK in any way, because it says in the article not many jobs are at risk
Leave a comment:
-
And still there are uneducated brexidiots who believe that transfering £166B out of the country does not impact the economy of the UK in any way, because it says in the article not many jobs are at risk
Leave a comment:
-
From a reputable Brexit supporting newspaper (I'm lying about the reputable bit)
Between 150 and 200 jobs will be created in Dublin as a result of the move which the bank said would be a combination of new jobs and those moving from the UK.
Kevin Wall, the CEO of Barclays’ Irish unit has told members of the U.K. Treasury Select Committee that these new roles are going to be over and above the 150 current U.K. jobs, which are likely to shift to Dublin, post Brexit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostWhaddya know? Maybe Barclays ARE a charity after all? The only other explanation is that you are talking out of your arse again.
The important bit is in bold. These are new jobs.
I've thought about it. Barclays are NOT in fact a charity. You really ARE as stupid as your comments suggest.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Uncle Albert View Postit's fairly safe to assume that a similar number of people were doing that work here.
Barclays are not a charity and won't carry on employing people in jobs that no longer exist.few jobs in London are expected to be affected.
Originally posted by Uncle Albert View PostThe bank's Dublin operation is expected to double in size to 300 people as a result of the business being channelled though the Irish capital
Originally posted by Uncle Albert View PostThink about it for a moment. You might work it out.
Leave a comment:
-
Tax base is moving - asset managers would make 0.5-1% per annum, that billions in tax leaving
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostNo they wouldn't.
Think about it for a moment. You might work it out.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: