• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "JLR not keen on No Deal"

Collapse

  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Have you included the staff PAYE taxes in that?

    No, just the taxes that they reported in their annual accounts. Also haven't included VAT, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    £199 million paid in tax last year.

    Is it because they are concerned about Brexit that you despise them?
    Do you only support businesses that think Brexit is a good idea and that pay all their taxes in the UK?
    Have you included the staff PAYE taxes in that?

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    And they pay tax of roughly fourpence halfpenny. And so it goes...
    £199 million paid in tax last year.

    Is it because they are concerned about Brexit that you despise them?
    Do you only support businesses that think Brexit is a good idea and that pay all their taxes in the UK?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    He thinks crashing the services economy will mean a surplus of contracting roles as large consultancies implode.
    As I said, magical thinking.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    To what extent have you considered how the broader economy may impinge on your lifestyle?
    He thinks crashing the services economy will mean a surplus of contracting roles as large consultancies implode.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    I'm not an international tradesperson so DGAF.

    Happy with my work/life balance these days, having chased the contracting cashpot for ten years.
    To what extent have you considered how the broader economy may impinge on your lifestyle?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    £18b in exports doesn’t necessarily mean much if they are all being transferred intercompany to NL at trade price and the U.K. exchequer doesn’t see any tax gain on commercial profits.

    A reduction from 40,000 jobs will hurt though, as will the 300,000 other jobs and associated tax revenues from supporting supply chain businesses, including current U.K. component manufacturers. Those businesses will also need to retool or adjust. Not a short-term task, 10 to 20 years.
    And they pay tax of roughly fourpence halfpenny. And so it goes...

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    ...that's easy, the government borrows money off the Chinese to get the French to build the plants.
    Yes at least we have control of our own energy supply,....oh wait

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    how many nuclear powerplants we need for that
    ...that's easy, the government borrows money off the Chinese to get the French to build the plants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Serious question, does this possibly open up the U.K. to be a world leader in sustainability and electric cars?

    Moving all standard production offshore, to concentrate U.K. R&D and engineers (who are still among the best in the world) on new tech?

    Competition from America and Germany to be sure, but competition can be a healthy thing.
    All those engineers come from EU countries and are leaving as we speak

    Besides that, did anyone think how we are going to charge the cars (if you live in an apartment building for example or you park your car at the streetside and there are limited charging points there will be huge fights amongst residents on a daily basis) and how many nuclear powerplants we need for that

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Well, if it's good enough for Audi...
    Audi have plants all over Europe (and beyond)
    Ingolstadt and Neckarsulm in Germany as well as Hungary, Belgium and Mexico.

    Then they have shared production with other VAG brands in Slovakia, Spain, Russia, Brazil, India and China. (not counting Lamborghini/Ducati, which is owned by Audi)

    The Slovakian plant was Skoda, and currently the Q7 is made there (along with other VAG cars).
    The Spanish plant was Seat, the Q3 is made there
    A1 - Belgium
    A3/TT - Hungary
    Q5 - Mexico (mostly for Americas)
    A3 & Q3 in Brazil (mostly for Americas)

    India & China manufacturing are for local markets, and the plant in Russia is there to get round import duties - the cars are fully built elsewhere, then stripped down, shipped to Russia as partial assemblies, then fully rebuilt in Russia.

    If JRM introduces punitive tariffs on the EU, then you might see an SKD or CKD process introduced in the UK if demand was high enough

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Only if that R&D can replace 40,000 jobs and £18bn in exports. (just for JRL)
    £18b in exports doesn’t necessarily mean much if they are all being transferred intercompany to NL at trade price and the U.K. exchequer doesn’t see any tax gain on commercial profits.

    A reduction from 40,000 jobs will hurt though, as will the 300,000 other jobs and associated tax revenues from supporting supply chain businesses, including current U.K. component manufacturers. Those businesses will also need to retool or adjust. Not a short-term task, 10 to 20 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Magical thinking will only get you so far in the harsh reality of international trade.
    I'm not an international tradesperson so DGAF.

    Happy with my work/life balance these days, having chased the contracting cashpot for ten years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Why not? As long as we aren't hamstrung by unfair green laws that only apply to certain countries, then we've got every chance of competing. Especially if we can get some crazy laws thrust upon the EU before we leave.
    Magical thinking will only get you so far in the harsh reality of international trade.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Serious question, does this possibly open up the U.K. to be a world leader in sustainability and electric cars?

    Moving all standard production offshore, to concentrate U.K. R&D and engineers (who are still among the best in the world) on new tech?

    Competition from America and Germany to be sure, but competition can be a healthy thing.
    Only if that R&D can replace 40,000 jobs and £18bn in exports. (just for JRL)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X