• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Another hypocrite

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Another hypocrite"

Collapse

  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Yes there is, you are quite correct - my apologies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    A couple of questions - how many active accounts do I have?
    3

    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Do you have evidence of me logging in under a different account when I'm under a ban?
    Yes, I read it on the side of a bus

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Irrelevant. You said there was no such thing, when clearly there is.

    Where the letter of the law is ambiguous, however, you may wish that your brief was equally versed in the spirit of the law.

    Spirit of the law | Tax Adviser
    Yes there is, you are quite correct - my apologies.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Thank you.

    If I appear in court I certainly hope my Brief is more practiced in the letter of the law than its spirit.
    Irrelevant. You said there was no such thing, when clearly there is.

    Where the letter of the law is ambiguous, however, you may wish that your brief was equally versed in the spirit of the law.

    Spirit of the law | Tax Adviser

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Aw - is the delicate likkle flower all upset?
    By a moron like you? Not a chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    bottom lip all a-tremble
    Aw - is the delicate likkle flower all upset?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    It was a joke you paranoid humourless nurk. Sheesh, some people are so touchy.
    Isn't it time for your afternoon wank?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    A couple of questions - how many active accounts do I have? Do you have evidence of me logging in under a different account when I'm under a ban?
    It was a joke you paranoid humourless nurk. Sheesh, some people are so touchy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Logged in on the wrong account?
    A couple of questions - how many active accounts do I have? Do you have evidence of me logging in under a different account when I'm under a ban?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    This is not meant to be an insult to you...
    Logged in on the wrong account?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    That’s a well-reasoned and fully cited argument.
    Thank you.

    If I appear in court I certainly hope my Brief is more practiced in the letter of the law than its spirit.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    That’s a well-reasoned and fully cited argument.
    He was trying to engage with you at your level.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    This is not meant to be an insult to you, but to what you have said. "Bollocks".
    That’s a well-reasoned and fully cited argument.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Don’t be so daft, of course there is, it’s a well-established concept.




    Of course. Any good accountant will save you money. Sometimes though if it’s a non-standard scheme or setup, the question isn’t whether you could, it’s whether you should.
    This is not meant to be an insult to you, but to what you have said. "Bollocks".

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    There is no such thing as "The Spirit of the law"!
    Don’t be so daft, of course there is, it’s a well-established concept.


    And his accountants probably say "Pay us £20 million and we'll save you £100 million".
    Of course. Any good accountant will save you money. Sometimes though if it’s a non-standard scheme or setup, the question isn’t whether you could, it’s whether you should.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X